-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
> Actually, this reminds me of the gate of a transistor.
>
> You could be onto something quite wonderful.
>
> T
Influencing entanglement without observation?
T
Or moving the observer back/forward in time, so to speak. This also relates
to expandin
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Actually, this reminds me of the gate of a transistor.
>
> You could be onto something quite wonderful.
>
> T
Influencing entanglement without observation?
T
Actually, this reminds me of the gate of a transistor.
You could be onto something quite wonderful.
T
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Interesting. Injecting known reality into "yet to be determined"
> influences YTBD to support an expected observation makes it more real?
Interesting. Injecting known reality into "yet to be determined"
influences YTBD to support an expected observation makes it more real?
Or am I missing something?
T
The hypothesis of enhancing a "QM probability field" within the LENR, which
can positively alter end results has been mentioned here before, but is
given little more than passing notice by most experimenters... probably
because it has not reached a threshold of "meme" entanglement yet. But it is
me
5 matches
Mail list logo
