igg...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 22, 2016 3:13 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:New Record Low Solar Price in
> Abu Dhabi – Costs Plunging Faster Than Expected
>
> From their video, it looks like they were trying to find a
<rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 3:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:New Record Low Solar Price in Abu
Dhabi – Costs Plunging Faster Than Expected
>From their video, it looks like they were trying to find a way to eliminate
one...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 1:32 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:New Record Low Solar Price in Abu
Dhabi – Costs Plunging Faster Than Expected
Terry,
They seem to contradict themselves: elsewhere they claim “the Efficoat
tech
:45 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:New Record Low Solar Price in Abu Dhabi – Costs
Plunging Faster Than Expected
It looks like an interesting technology. However, the real metric is not in
panel efficiency or system efficiency, it is total$/kWh. This has to i
>From their video, it looks like they were trying to find a way to eliminate
electron recombination in the silicon lattice to improve efficiency. They
may be planning to do that with fields created with the pyroelectric
films. Since the typical delta T from front to back in the panel is 26C,
Stephen,
I’m not sure the E field is static. It could look more like electronic noise.
The inventor – Kumar - also has other patent apps which indicate the way he is
going.
20150108851 Photovoltaic systems with shaped high frequency electric pulses
At least one photovoltaic (PV) cell
Sounds sort of reasonable.
But something comes to mind -- the E field they apply, as described,
doesn't do any work, as far as I can tell. It /just/ biases the cell.
IOW it's a static E field.
In particular, since there's no path for the charge to leave the
"plates" (front and back
Here is the patent application – or one of them
https://www.google.com/patents/US20120216847
Abstract
A method to increase the efficiency of a solar cell comprises applying one of a
transparent pyroelectric film and a plurality of films in a stack on a front
surface of the solar cell
Terry,
They seem to contradict themselves: elsewhere they claim “the Efficoat
technology” provides 15-20% improvement in power production from ordinary solar
panels over the course of a typical day.” This would lead one to believe that
the panels are coated.
If the coating is not on
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> This brings to mind a local company (SF Bay) with an add-on product for
solar cells which they claim increases the power and efficiency. The
technology uses a pyroelectric coating for the cells and a feedback
mechanism.
It looks like an interesting technology. However, the real metric is not
in panel efficiency or system efficiency, it is total$/kWh. This has to
include the longevity of the panel. The total cost/kWh over the life of
the panel is its installed cost (+maintenance costs) amortized over the
life
This brings to mind a local company (SF Bay) with an add-on product for solar
cells which they claim increases the power and efficiency. The technology uses
a pyroelectric coating for the cells and a feedback mechanism.
The company is UltraSolar. It has been mentioned before here, but it may
http://rameznaam.com/2016/09/21/new-record-low-solar-price-in-abu-dhabi-costs-plunging-faster-than-expected/
13 matches
Mail list logo