RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Brian—

I reviewed your reference document that Jones identified.

The potential energy wells for the linear field and non-linear electric fields 
in a
Quantum system are what I would expect in a one dimensional approximation.

However, keep in mind that a local B magnetic field at the location of the 
potential well in a coherent system will cause what is referred to as a 
degenerate system of energy states with additional potential wells at the 
location of the original potential well.  This causes a more restricted area 
where a charge in the area of the potential is allowed to exist.  The 
probability of finding a charge at certain locations is increased.  As the 
charge density increases within a given space, probability of 2 charges getting 
close with effective boundaries over lapping increases as would the likelihood 
of LENR.

If Li-7 and H were in the same potential well, Be-8 may occur with the 
generation of 2 alphas in a subsequent spontaneous fission reaction, which I 
would not classify as a LENR reaction given the high linear momentum of the 
alphas.  However the initial Li-H reaction would be a LENR reaction, since 
there was little or no linear momentum of the of the reactants available to 
initiate the reaction.

Some of the recent theories identified here on Vortex that predict attractive 
forces between like charges at close center-to-center distances may be 
operative in LENR.  Of course the Cooper--pairing  of like charges in a 
magnetic field may also be an effect that initiates LENR in a lattice with 
extreme B fields.  Resonant variation of the B field intensity may improve 
chances of LENR by effecting the overlap of adjacent nucleons.

Metals with high magnetic susceptibility will produce greater  B fields to 
cause a more extreme degeneracy in a potential well as discussed above.

Bob Cook

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10


From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 1:14:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio


Earlier today Jones referenced my work on energy localization and nanomagnetism 
as a potential explanation for the Manelas device operation,


I never considered that inputing 2 of the three windings around the ferrite 
core could result in a superwave condition.  That makes so much sense. Why 
didn't I think of it.


I wondered how Arthur developed fast rise time pulses with so much inductance.


As usual, I welcome suggestions.



From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 12:50 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio


I agree with the idea of adding a dimension to Holmlid’s laser setup—may be 
expensive however, since lasers with the appropriate frequency may be necessary 
to get good coupling.  Given known quadrupole magnetic moments in various data 
sources for the stable (and unstable} Ni nucleons, picking design parameters 
for the lasers may be easy.



The objective should be to stimulate a target Ni nucleus to a meta stable 
energy spin state, which then is allowed to decay—given the lattice 
coupling---to a new lower potential energy spin state.



This scheme of transmutation of radioactive waste was proposed as an 
alternative in the DOE’s nuclear waste management EIS of the mid 1970’s—1976 as 
I recall.  It was one of several different options considered at that time.   
However, it was dismissed because the necessary technology was not available to 
accomplish the desired stimulation the radioactive waste.  This situation has 
changed with subsequent development of lasers of most any frequency desired.



Two lasers, if in resonance, may provide magnetic quadrupole coupling necessary 
to unlock the potential energy of Ni nucleons of a coherent lattice, just as in 
the Letts-Cravens Pd system.



Conserving linear momentum is not an issue, since the system is not stimulated 
with high linear momentum particles, as is the case in simple two-body nuclear 
interactions.  Thus ionizing radiation is absent, as is the case with LENR.  
Only angular momentum (and total energy) are conserved in an LENR process IMHO.





Bob Cook

From: JonesBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 7:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio





I should have mentioned that another wrinkle on superwaves could employ light 
waves - the so-called Letts-Cravens effect where laser irradiation of two 
lasers impinge on a loaded lattice.



AFAIK – Holmlid has always used only one laser.



Perhaps he should superwave it ?



Another wrinkle would be RF + laser. Or 2xRF + laser? Or 2xRF + 2xlaser?









Why superwaves?



A known mechanism for wave amplificat

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[mixent]

In reply to  mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sun, 03 Dec 2017 13:33:57 +1100:
Hi,

PS - I think this is what I recollect reading some time ago:-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_Specific_Impulse_Magnetoplasma_Rocket
Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[mixent]

In reply to  Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 2 Dec 2017 07:01:42 -0700:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
>Hi Robin,  Can you supply a link?  The only thing I can find with ion
>thrusters is that the magnetic field is used to prevent the ions from
>striking the side walls.  I didn't find anything that suggests that a
>magnetic field can turn high energy ion trajectories from an
>omnidirectional source into unidirectional thrust.  Magnetic fields only
>make the ion path curl.
>
>BH
This appears to be relevant:- https://patents.google.com/patent/US7482597B2/en

See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetoplasmadynamic_thruster

Try Googling "MPD thrusters"

Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[mixent]

In reply to  Bob Higgins's message of Sat, 2 Dec 2017 07:01:42 -0700:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
>Hi Robin,  Can you supply a link?  The only thing I can find with ion
>thrusters is that the magnetic field is used to prevent the ions from
>striking the side walls.  I didn't find anything that suggests that a
>magnetic field can turn high energy ion trajectories from an
>omnidirectional source into unidirectional thrust.  Magnetic fields only
>make the ion path curl.
>
>BH
I'll see what I can dig up. IIRC, the field is more intense at the point of the
V and less at the other (open) end. The result is that charged particles
"bounce" where the field is intense, and escape at the other end, with a net
thrust applied to the rocket via the magnetic field.
You see a similar phenomenon with the charged particles in the Van Allen belts,
where they oscillate back and forth between the Earth's magnetic poles.

The jets (particle streams) emitted by some black holes may be another example.

Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Brian Ahern]

Earlier today Jones referenced my work on energy localization and nanomagnetism 
as a potential explanation for the Manelas device operation,


I never considered that inputing 2 of the three windings around the ferrite 
core could result in a superwave condition.  That makes so much sense. Why 
didn't I think of it.


I wondered how Arthur developed fast rise time pulses with so much inductance.


As usual, I welcome suggestions.



From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 12:50 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio


I agree with the idea of adding a dimension to Holmlid’s laser setup—may be 
expensive however, since lasers with the appropriate frequency may be necessary 
to get good coupling.  Given known quadrupole magnetic moments in various data 
sources for the stable (and unstable} Ni nucleons, picking design parameters 
for the lasers may be easy.



The objective should be to stimulate a target Ni nucleus to a meta stable 
energy spin state, which then is allowed to decay—given the lattice 
coupling---to a new lower potential energy spin state.



This scheme of transmutation of radioactive waste was proposed as an 
alternative in the DOE’s nuclear waste management EIS of the mid 1970’s—1976 as 
I recall.  It was one of several different options considered at that time.   
However, it was dismissed because the necessary technology was not available to 
accomplish the desired stimulation the radioactive waste.  This situation has 
changed with subsequent development of lasers of most any frequency desired.



Two lasers, if in resonance, may provide magnetic quadrupole coupling necessary 
to unlock the potential energy of Ni nucleons of a coherent lattice, just as in 
the Letts-Cravens Pd system.



Conserving linear momentum is not an issue, since the system is not stimulated 
with high linear momentum particles, as is the case in simple two-body nuclear 
interactions.  Thus ionizing radiation is absent, as is the case with LENR.  
Only angular momentum (and total energy) are conserved in an LENR process IMHO.





Bob Cook

From: JonesBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 7:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio





I should have mentioned that another wrinkle on superwaves could employ light 
waves - the so-called Letts-Cravens effect where laser irradiation of two 
lasers impinge on a loaded lattice.



AFAIK – Holmlid has always used only one laser.



Perhaps he should superwave it ?



Another wrinkle would be RF + laser. Or 2xRF + laser? Or 2xRF + 2xlaser?









Why superwaves?



A known mechanism for wave amplification in rigid structures is called  “energy 
localization” which can be a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. When stimulated with two waveforms at different frequencies, a 
paradigm shift can be engineered on the vibrational modes of bound particles 
(protons in a lattice). Nuclear reactions can happen in rare cases, but even 
without them thermal gain is possible at the nanoscale in blatant violation to 
the Laws or Thermodynamics. This is essentially proved but scaling up to useful 
levels is not proved.



In the Schrödinger equation you can find the term for quantum kinetic energy as 
the second derivative of the wave function for place. The closer the particle 
is confined, the greater the curvature of its wave function and the greater is 
its quantum kinetic energy (the energy localization). It can be a power law 
increase, see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNonlinear_Schr%25C3%25B6dinger_equation=02%7C01%7CAhern_Brian%40msn.com%7Cb855bf14220a4c0caad308d539ad358e%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636478338450277307=SvVxpaPbLdcQF55XjbjY96XNVxsuqhYrUewtjgNZfmk%3D=0>



In simpler terms, Quantum kinetic energy is the kinetic energy with which bound 
protons move through the lattice - and this energy can be nonlinear wrt input. 
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the closer the particle is 
confined, the smaller its freedom of movement Δx and thus - the more violent it 
wriggles back and forth, and the greater is his  Δp . Intersecting waveforms 
can provide the increased confinement and the resultant gain is the theory 
behind the “superwave”.



RE: GRANTED US patent which cites the Dardik superwave patent



https://encrypted.google.com/patents/US9540960<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fencrypted.google.com%2Fpatents%2FUS9540960=02%7C01%7CAhern_Brian%40msn.com%7Cb855bf14220a4c0caad308d539ad358e%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636478338450277307=q2%2BwskuPg%2BYLmaVT4Kx4UUmXI9pAj2jYX5f0Nbr2

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

I agree with the idea of adding a dimension to Holmlid’s laser setup—may be 
expensive however, since lasers with the appropriate frequency may be necessary 
to get good coupling.  Given known quadrupole magnetic moments in various data 
sources for the stable (and unstable} Ni nucleons, picking design parameters 
for the lasers may be easy.

The objective should be to stimulate a target Ni nucleus to a meta stable 
energy spin state, which then is allowed to decay—given the lattice 
coupling---to a new lower potential energy spin state.

This scheme of transmutation of radioactive waste was proposed as an 
alternative in the DOE’s nuclear waste management EIS of the mid 1970’s—1976 as 
I recall.  It was one of several different options considered at that time.   
However, it was dismissed because the necessary technology was not available to 
accomplish the desired stimulation the radioactive waste.  This situation has 
changed with subsequent development of lasers of most any frequency desired.

Two lasers, if in resonance, may provide magnetic quadrupole coupling necessary 
to unlock the potential energy of Ni nucleons of a coherent lattice, just as in 
the Letts-Cravens Pd system.

Conserving linear momentum is not an issue, since the system is not stimulated 
with high linear momentum particles, as is the case in simple two-body nuclear 
interactions.  Thus ionizing radiation is absent, as is the case with LENR.  
Only angular momentum (and total energy) are conserved in an LENR process IMHO.


Bob Cook
From: JonesBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 7:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio


I should have mentioned that another wrinkle on superwaves could employ light 
waves - the so-called Letts-Cravens effect where laser irradiation of two 
lasers impinge on a loaded lattice.

AFAIK – Holmlid has always used only one laser.

Perhaps he should superwave it ?

Another wrinkle would be RF + laser. Or 2xRF + laser? Or 2xRF + 2xlaser?




Why superwaves?

A known mechanism for wave amplification in rigid structures is called  “energy 
localization” which can be a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. When stimulated with two waveforms at different frequencies, a 
paradigm shift can be engineered on the vibrational modes of bound particles 
(protons in a lattice). Nuclear reactions can happen in rare cases, but even 
without them thermal gain is possible at the nanoscale in blatant violation to 
the Laws or Thermodynamics. This is essentially proved but scaling up to useful 
levels is not proved.

In the Schrödinger equation you can find the term for quantum kinetic energy as 
the second derivative of the wave function for place. The closer the particle 
is confined, the greater the curvature of its wave function and the greater is 
its quantum kinetic energy (the energy localization). It can be a power law 
increase, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

In simpler terms, Quantum kinetic energy is the kinetic energy with which bound 
protons move through the lattice - and this energy can be nonlinear wrt input. 
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the closer the particle is 
confined, the smaller its freedom of movement Δx and thus - the more violent it 
wriggles back and forth, and the greater is his  Δp . Intersecting waveforms 
can provide the increased confinement and the resultant gain is the theory 
behind the “superwave”.

RE: GRANTED US patent which cites the Dardik superwave patent

https://encrypted.google.com/patents/US9540960

It is no coincidence that Energetics, Violante, McKubre,  Chauvin, Rossi, 
Brillouin, Kimmel group, etc, all employed similar interfering and 
self-amplifying RF waveforms as input power.

Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, the Euro Patent from Dardik 
(El-Boher et al)  provides a known mechanism for wave power amplification 
-“energy localization” which is a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. Generally the COP is limited to a low range using this mechanism but 
it can be gainful without nuclear reactions. It is also difficult to scale up. 
See:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/AhernBSenergyloca.pdf

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Jones—

Nice research—superwaves.

I like the idea that proton motion in a lattice is considered to entail kinetic 
energy.   Here is one more mechanism for sharing potential energy of a coherent 
system—the lattice of Pd or Ni atoms and all its constituents---with the 
potential energy of the system’s EM and gravitational fields coupling the 
various constituents.

The non-linearity makes it hard to accept by those old folks not familiar with 
the math and calculational  schemes used these days to evaluate a multi-bodied 
coherent systems, yet seems to imply exact solutions to the QM wave equation.

Rossi’s power supply may be designed to provide EM superwaves that resonate 
with the H in the Ni lattice of his QX reactor.  (I know that is a stretch for 
many Vorts.)

Bob Cook



Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10


From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 7:24:08 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio


Why superwaves?

A known mechanism for wave amplification in rigid structures is called  “energy 
localization” which can be a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. When stimulated with two waveforms at different frequencies, a 
paradigm shift can be engineered on the vibrational modes of bound particles 
(protons in a lattice). Nuclear reactions can happen in rare cases, but even 
without them thermal gain is possible at the nanoscale in blatant violation to 
the Laws or Thermodynamics. This is essentially proved but scaling up to useful 
levels is not proved.

In the Schrödinger equation you can find the term for quantum kinetic energy as 
the second derivative of the wave function for place. The closer the particle 
is confined, the greater the curvature of its wave function and the greater is 
its quantum kinetic energy (the energy localization). It can be a power law 
increase, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

In simpler terms, Quantum kinetic energy is the kinetic energy with which bound 
protons move through the lattice - and this energy can be nonlinear wrt input. 
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the closer the particle is 
confined, the smaller its freedom of movement Δx and thus - the more violent it 
wriggles back and forth, and the greater is his  Δp . Intersecting waveforms 
can provide the increased confinement and the resultant gain is the theory 
behind the “superwave”.



RE: GRANTED US patent which cites the Dardik superwave patent

https://encrypted.google.com/patents/US9540960

It is no coincidence that Energetics, Violante, McKubre,  Chauvin, Rossi, 
Brillouin, Kimmel group, etc, all employed similar interfering and 
self-amplifying RF waveforms as input power.

Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, the Euro Patent from Dardik 
(El-Boher et al)  provides a known mechanism for wave power amplification 
-“energy localization” which is a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. Generally the COP is limited to a low range using this mechanism but 
it can be gainful without nuclear reactions. It is also difficult to scale up. 
See:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/AhernBSenergyloca.pdf

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Adrian Ashfield]

 Adrian Ashfield
December 1, 2017 at 11:20 AM

Dear Andrea Rossi:
You say the E-Cat QX worked at limited power during the Stockholm event at the 

IVA (20 W). What is its real power?
Regards,
Adrian Ashfield


Andrea Rossi
December 1, 2017 at 12:31 PM

Adrian Ashfield:
Average 60 W, max for continuous operation 100 W
Warm Regards,
A.R.

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[JonesBeene]

I should have mentioned that another wrinkle on superwaves could employ light 
waves - the so-called Letts-Cravens effect where laser irradiation of two 
lasers impinge on a loaded lattice.

AFAIK – Holmlid has always used only one laser.

Perhaps he should superwave it ?

Another wrinkle would be RF + laser. Or 2xRF + laser? Or 2xRF + 2xlaser?




Why superwaves?

A known mechanism for wave amplification in rigid structures is called  “energy 
localization” which can be a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. When stimulated with two waveforms at different frequencies, a 
paradigm shift can be engineered on the vibrational modes of bound particles 
(protons in a lattice). Nuclear reactions can happen in rare cases, but even 
without them thermal gain is possible at the nanoscale in blatant violation to 
the Laws or Thermodynamics. This is essentially proved but scaling up to useful 
levels is not proved. 

In the Schrödinger equation you can find the term for quantum kinetic energy as 
the second derivative of the wave function for place. The closer the particle 
is confined, the greater the curvature of its wave function and the greater is 
its quantum kinetic energy (the energy localization). It can be a power law 
increase, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

In simpler terms, Quantum kinetic energy is the kinetic energy with which bound 
protons move through the lattice - and this energy can be nonlinear wrt input. 
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the closer the particle is 
confined, the smaller its freedom of movement Δx and thus - the more violent it 
wriggles back and forth, and the greater is his  Δp . Intersecting waveforms 
can provide the increased confinement and the resultant gain is the theory 
behind the “superwave”.


RE: GRANTED US patent which cites the Dardik superwave patent

https://encrypted.google.com/patents/US9540960

It is no coincidence that Energetics, Violante, McKubre,  Chauvin, Rossi, 
Brillouin, Kimmel group, etc, all employed similar interfering and 
self-amplifying RF waveforms as input power.

Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, the Euro Patent from Dardik 
(El-Boher et al)  provides a known mechanism for wave power amplification 
-“energy localization” which is a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. Generally the COP is limited to a low range using this mechanism but 
it can be gainful without nuclear reactions. It is also difficult to scale up. 
See:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/AhernBSenergyloca.pdf

 

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[JonesBeene]

Why superwaves?

A known mechanism for wave amplification in rigid structures is called  “energy 
localization” which can be a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. When stimulated with two waveforms at different frequencies, a 
paradigm shift can be engineered on the vibrational modes of bound particles 
(protons in a lattice). Nuclear reactions can happen in rare cases, but even 
without them thermal gain is possible at the nanoscale in blatant violation to 
the Laws or Thermodynamics. This is essentially proved but scaling up to useful 
levels is not proved. 

In the Schrödinger equation you can find the term for quantum kinetic energy as 
the second derivative of the wave function for place. The closer the particle 
is confined, the greater the curvature of its wave function and the greater is 
its quantum kinetic energy (the energy localization). It can be a power law 
increase, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

In simpler terms, Quantum kinetic energy is the kinetic energy with which bound 
protons move through the lattice - and this energy can be nonlinear wrt input. 
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the closer the particle is 
confined, the smaller its freedom of movement Δx and thus - the more violent it 
wriggles back and forth, and the greater is his  Δp . Intersecting waveforms 
can provide the increased confinement and the resultant gain is the theory 
behind the “superwave”.



RE: GRANTED US patent which cites the Dardik superwave patent

https://encrypted.google.com/patents/US9540960

It is no coincidence that Energetics, Violante, McKubre,  Chauvin, Rossi, 
Brillouin, Kimmel group, etc, all employed similar interfering and 
self-amplifying RF waveforms as input power.

Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, the Euro Patent from Dardik 
(El-Boher et al)  provides a known mechanism for wave power amplification 
-“energy localization” which is a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a 
lattice. Generally the COP is limited to a low range using this mechanism but 
it can be gainful without nuclear reactions. It is also difficult to scale up. 
See:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/AhernBSenergyloca.pdf

 

[Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Bob Higgins]

Hi Robin,  Can you supply a link?  The only thing I can find with ion
thrusters is that the magnetic field is used to prevent the ions from
striking the side walls.  I didn't find anything that suggests that a
magnetic field can turn high energy ion trajectories from an
omnidirectional source into unidirectional thrust.  Magnetic fields only
make the ion path curl.

BH

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 6:32 PM,  wrote:

> In reply to  Bob Higgins's message of Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:48:01 -0700:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >I cannot comprehend a magnetic field configuration that would
> unidirectionally focus an omnidirectional emission of alpha particles.  If
> you had such a thing it would be useful for making radioisotope alpha
> emitter batteries.
>
> It's a funnel shaped magnetic field. Look up the latest advances in ion
> propulsion.
> Regards,
>
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> local asymmetry = temporary success
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[mixent]

In reply to  Bob Higgins's message of Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:48:01 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>I cannot comprehend a magnetic field configuration that would unidirectionally 
>focus an omnidirectional emission of alpha particles.  If you had such a thing 
>it would be useful for making radioisotope alpha emitter batteries.

It's a funnel shaped magnetic field. Look up the latest advances in ion
propulsion.
Regards,


Robin van Spaandonk

local asymmetry = temporary success

[Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Bob Higgins]

Unfortunately Bob, some formatting error occurred in your email and I could
not read the whole of the first paragraph.

What you say about the plasma consisting of "Li ions, microscopic Li
droplets, microscopic Al droplets and Al ions" is possible, though the Li
and Al "droplets" are unlikely.  Any Li droplets would certainly evaporate
in the plasma, and any Al droplets would likely fall out of the plasma but
is possible some remain.  Rossi never claimed a "neutral" plasma that I
remember (I could be wrong).  He claimed approximately equal positive ion
and electron currents.  If the tube were a high vacuum electron tube, there
would only be electron carriers of the current.  In such a case, the mean
free path would be long and characteristic x-rays would be emitted from the
Ni electrode.  Since there are approximately equal positive ion carriers as
electrons (if we believe Rossi's claim), the mean free path will be short
(due to electron impact causing the positive ions), and the electron energy
at the anode will be small and produce no x-rays.

I cannot comprehend a magnetic field configuration that would
unidirectionally focus an omnidirectional emission of alpha particles.  If
you had such a thing it would be useful for making radioisotope alpha
emitter batteries.

I saw no evidence of sufficient apparatus to generate a quadrapole magnetic
field in Rossi's reactor.  I also doubt that he has that competence.

BH

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:40 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com <
bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Higgins—Regarding your comments:
>
>
>
> The spectrometer Rossi  is said to have  used, if connected via fiber
> optics, would be limited in its effective range of wavelength monitoring
> from 200 nm to about 2200 nm.  The peak of black body radiation
>
> at 2300 C is in this range,  However, the peak as a function of radiance
> is fairly flat in this range.  The peak wavelengths that Rossi’s demo
> displayed were not associated with the black body radiation  temperature of
>
>
>
> I would guess that Rossi does not want spectrum data publicized, since it
> would tell too much about the mechanisms at work.
>
>
>
> The conducting medium within the plasma may be made up of Li ions,
> microscopic Li droplets, microscopic Al droplets and Al ions.  The H is
> either absorbed by the Ni or remains as a H2 molecule.  This assumption of
> the composition of gas is what I have called a “dusty” plasma expecting
> that the material is not  strictly an ionic substance.  I have never heard
> of neutral plasmas,  which neutrality Rossi has indicated is characteristic
> of his QX reactor.
>
>
>
> If the LENR produces alphas and results from a magnetic field with its
> directionality, the alpha emission may
>
> also display a related directionality.
>
>
>
> Finally the signal driving the reactor may be a quadrupole magnetic field
> to produce nuclear spin states that resonate with lattice electron  spin
> states. Such a driver may require significant energy to achieve the proper
> resonances with enough energy to change the nuclear energy states and allow
> nuclear transmutation.  To be useful as a heat source the change of
> potential energy and increase of the lattice energy or kinetic energy of
> emitted alphas would  have to be substantially greater than the energy
> needed to create the signal driving the reactor.
>
>
>
>  Bob Cook
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
> --
> *From:* Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 1, 2017 7:08:35 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio
>
> As I understand it, Rossi is said to have recorded the spectrum using
> something like an Ocean Optics fiber spectrometer (
> https://oceanoptics.com/product/ocean-fx/).  A typical gas discharge
> spectrum will be a mix of blackbody for the plasma and lines from the key
> atomic and ionic species.  This spectrometer is capable of recording the
> full spectrum as a function of time so as to show the different stages of
> plasma formation, discharge, and turn-OFF.  It is highly likely that the
> spectrum will change significantly in each of these phases.  The stronger
> the lines are, the more likely that the gas is low pressure.  Stronger
> blackbody plasma discharge is characteristic of higher gas pressure.  The
> plasma will shut off quickly when electrical discharge is stopped.  There
> can be fluorescence during the discharge and afterglow (phosphorescence) in
> the system after discharge, depending upon the impurities in the glass tube
> (which could be implanted during discharge).  After

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Higgins—Regarding your comments:

The spectrometer Rossi  is said to have  used, if connected via fiber optics, 
would be limited in its effective range of wavelength monitoring from 200 nm to 
about 2200 nm.  The peak of black body radiation
at 2300 C is in this range,  However, the peak as a function of radiance is 
fairly flat in this range.  The peak wavelengths that Rossi’s demo displayed 
were not associated with the black body radiation  temperature of

I would guess that Rossi does not want spectrum data publicized, since it would 
tell too much about the mechanisms at work.

The conducting medium within the plasma may be made up of Li ions, microscopic 
Li droplets, microscopic Al droplets and Al ions.  The H is either absorbed by 
the Ni or remains as a H2 molecule.  This assumption of the composition of gas 
is what I have called a “dusty” plasma expecting that the material is not  
strictly an ionic substance.  I have never heard of neutral plasmas,  which 
neutrality Rossi has indicated is characteristic of his QX reactor.

If the LENR produces alphas and results from a magnetic field with its 
directionality, the alpha emission may
also display a related directionality.

Finally the signal driving the reactor may be a quadrupole magnetic field to 
produce nuclear spin states that resonate with lattice electron  spin states. 
Such a driver may require significant energy to achieve the proper resonances 
with enough energy to change the nuclear energy states and allow nuclear 
transmutation.  To be useful as a heat source the change of potential energy 
and increase of the lattice energy or kinetic energy of emitted alphas would  
have to be substantially greater than the energy needed to create the signal 
driving the reactor.

 Bob Cook


Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10


From: Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 7:08:35 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

As I understand it, Rossi is said to have recorded the spectrum using something 
like an Ocean Optics fiber spectrometer 
(https://oceanoptics.com/product/ocean-fx/).  A typical gas discharge spectrum 
will be a mix of blackbody for the plasma and lines from the key atomic and 
ionic species.  This spectrometer is capable of recording the full spectrum as 
a function of time so as to show the different stages of plasma formation, 
discharge, and turn-OFF.  It is highly likely that the spectrum will change 
significantly in each of these phases.  The stronger the lines are, the more 
likely that the gas is low pressure.  Stronger blackbody plasma discharge is 
characteristic of higher gas pressure.  The plasma will shut off quickly when 
electrical discharge is stopped.  There can be fluorescence during the 
discharge and afterglow (phosphorescence) in the system after discharge, 
depending upon the impurities in the glass tube (which could be implanted 
during discharge).  Afterglow does not per se indicate any LENR reaction.

Since alphas would have been emitted omnidirectionally, it would not produce a 
DC current through the tube of any significance.  The axial geometry of such a 
tube would mean that the side walls would get most of any alphas that might be 
generated.

There is no evidence that this is a dusty plasma reactor.  Whenever the tube 
cools off, the Li vapor would condense on the side walls taking any "dust" with 
it.  In a dusty plasma reactor it takes a great deal of effort to keep the dust 
in the plasma.  Suhas used ultrasound.  Egely uses an acoustically resonant 
reactor body.  In the descriptions I have heard, I see no evidence that Rossi's 
QX is based on dusty plasma technology.  Instead, it appears to be only a Li + 
H2 plasma.  It is possible that some Ni could be evaporated from the 
electrodes, but I believe it would condense quickly on the side walls of the 
tube near the electrodes - I don't believe it would stay in plasma.  These 
areas of condensed Ni on the side walls could be LENR active though.


On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Axil Axil 
<janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Mats Lewan is said to have seen the QX produce deep blue color when running at 
100%. Even at 30%, the QX produces light at between 400 to 500 nm that I saw 
recorded with my own eyes recorded on the spectrograph as seen in the video. I 
don't beleive the info on light production that is coming from Rossi. That info 
might be self serving. Rossi might be  seeing what he wants to see. Rossi says 
that the light produced was measured at 1100nm. This is infrared light and is 
not even visible. How can Rossi get a valid blackbody heat reading when the QX 
is running at 30% power level? Those people at the Demo should have reacted to 
this discontinuity in logic during the demo in real time.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 

[Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Bob Higgins]

As I understand it, Rossi is said to have recorded the spectrum using
something like an Ocean Optics fiber spectrometer (
https://oceanoptics.com/product/ocean-fx/).  A typical gas discharge
spectrum will be a mix of blackbody for the plasma and lines from the key
atomic and ionic species.  This spectrometer is capable of recording the
full spectrum as a function of time so as to show the different stages of
plasma formation, discharge, and turn-OFF.  It is highly likely that the
spectrum will change significantly in each of these phases.  The stronger
the lines are, the more likely that the gas is low pressure.  Stronger
blackbody plasma discharge is characteristic of higher gas pressure.  The
plasma will shut off quickly when electrical discharge is stopped.  There
can be fluorescence during the discharge and afterglow (phosphorescence) in
the system after discharge, depending upon the impurities in the glass tube
(which could be implanted during discharge).  Afterglow does not per se
indicate any LENR reaction.

Since alphas would have been emitted omnidirectionally, it would not
produce a DC current through the tube of any significance.  The axial
geometry of such a tube would mean that the side walls would get most of
any alphas that might be generated.

There is no evidence that this is a dusty plasma reactor.  Whenever the
tube cools off, the Li vapor would condense on the side walls taking any
"dust" with it.  In a dusty plasma reactor it takes a great deal of effort
to keep the dust in the plasma.  Suhas used ultrasound.  Egely uses an
acoustically resonant reactor body.  In the descriptions I have heard, I
see no evidence that Rossi's QX is based on dusty plasma technology.
Instead, it appears to be only a Li + H2 plasma.  It is possible that some
Ni could be evaporated from the electrodes, but I believe it would condense
quickly on the side walls of the tube near the electrodes - I don't believe
it would stay in plasma.  These areas of condensed Ni on the side walls
could be LENR active though.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Mats Lewan is said to have seen the QX produce deep blue color when
> running at 100%. Even at 30%, the QX produces light at between 400 to 500
> nm that I saw recorded with my own eyes recorded on the spectrograph as
> seen in the video. I don't beleive the info on light production that is
> coming from Rossi. That info might be self serving. Rossi might be  seeing
> what he wants to see. Rossi says that the light produced was measured at
> 1100nm. This is infrared light and is not even visible. How can Rossi get a
> valid blackbody heat reading when the QX is running at 30% power level?
> Those people at the Demo should have reacted to this discontinuity in logic
> during the demo in real time.
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:08 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com <
> bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Higgins—
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with your comment about a high voltage (short) at the beginning
>> of the reaction in the QX reactor.  It is consistent with the flash of
>> light which can be seen at the end of the reactor upon the initial power
>> application.
>>
>>
>>
>> Your assessment does not address the source of energy during the off
>> phases of the control circuit.  I would argue that the reaction producing
>> heat is occurring in the Ni electrode with the Li acting as a good
>> convective heat transfer agent from the electrode to the outer
>> circumference  of the reactor where the water cooling occurs.
>>
>>
>>
>> The electric current is generated by the net positive charge  that
>> results from the reaction that produces energetic alphas that cross the
>> annular space where the dusty plasma exists and charge the outer surface of
>> the reactor.
>>
>>
>>
>> I disagree with Axil that the suncell hydrino reaction is like the QX
>> reaction.  The spectra of the two reactions are not reported to be alike.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob Cook
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2017 10:50:23 AM
>> *To:* vortex-l
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio
>>
>> The QX is a downsized version of the SunCell with the plasma ball reduced
>> to the size of a speck of dust. You can understand what is happening inside
>> the QX by looking at what is happening inside the SunCell. The metal used
>> in the QX is aluminum whereas the metal used to support the plasma inside
>> the SunCell is silver.Lithium is not a reactant and remains in the vapor
>> form

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Axil Axil]

Mats Lewan is said to have seen the QX produce deep blue color when running
at 100%. Even at 30%, the QX produces light at between 400 to 500 nm that I
saw recorded with my own eyes recorded on the spectrograph as seen in the
video. I don't beleive the info on light production that is
coming from Rossi. That info might be self serving. Rossi might be  seeing
what he wants to see. Rossi says that the light produced was measured at
1100nm. This is infrared light and is not even visible. How can Rossi get a
valid blackbody heat reading when the QX is running at 30% power level?
Those people at the Demo should have reacted to this discontinuity in logic
during the demo in real time.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:08 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com <
bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Higgins—
>
>
>
> I agree with your comment about a high voltage (short) at the beginning of
> the reaction in the QX reactor.  It is consistent with the flash of light
> which can be seen at the end of the reactor upon the initial power
> application.
>
>
>
> Your assessment does not address the source of energy during the off
> phases of the control circuit.  I would argue that the reaction producing
> heat is occurring in the Ni electrode with the Li acting as a good
> convective heat transfer agent from the electrode to the outer
> circumference  of the reactor where the water cooling occurs.
>
>
>
> The electric current is generated by the net positive charge  that results
> from the reaction that produces energetic alphas that cross the annular
> space where the dusty plasma exists and charge the outer surface of the
> reactor.
>
>
>
> I disagree with Axil that the suncell hydrino reaction is like the QX
> reaction.  The spectra of the two reactions are not reported to be alike.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2017 10:50:23 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio
>
> The QX is a downsized version of the SunCell with the plasma ball reduced
> to the size of a speck of dust. You can understand what is happening inside
> the QX by looking at what is happening inside the SunCell. The metal used
> in the QX is aluminum whereas the metal used to support the plasma inside
> the SunCell is silver.Lithium is not a reactant and remains in the vapor
> form. The hydrogen pressure is very high because the amount of solid fuel
> that is placed inside the QX must be substantial in order for the fuel
> loading to be manageable. Rossi cannot work with(load) nanograms of fuel
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In the experiments I am aware of, waveforms were only tried as applied to
>> the heater coils (or in my case to a magnetic field coil).  There was no
>> evidence of enhanced XH.  This could be because the waveform was not well
>> "coupled" to the active medium.  These were heat driven Parkhomov-like
>> experiments.  In the case of others that have seen benefit from such waves,
>> the stimulus was applied more directly to the reaction medium -
>> electrolysis or to the hydrogenated wires.   I believe there could be
>> benefit in such stimuli, but it would have to be appropriately coupled to
>> the reaction.
>>
>> In a conversation I was having with MFMP folks, I had this to say about
>> what I thought was described for the QX reactor and power supply:
>>
>>
>> *Since it has been suggested/said that Li is present inside the QX,
>> during a discharge it will be in gas phase; and when it is turned OFF, it
>> will condense on the inside of the tube and conduct across the electrodes.
>> Then, upon re-start, the tube will be shorted with this condensed Li metal
>> path and a high current will be needed to heat the Li to boiling.  Once the
>> Li path evaporates, the tube will have to be run in gas discharge mode.  So
>> initially the tube is a short and needs a high current, low voltage to
>> begin, and then it has to switch into gas discharge mode which is low
>> current high voltage.  Also, in the gas discharge mode, the supply will
>> have to be ballasted as a current source.  This is why the supply is
>> complex, the waveform is complex, and why it is also difficult to
>> characterize what energy has been supplied over time to the tube.  There is
>> the claim that there is balanced electron/ion flow.  That would be the H+ &
>> Li+ positive ions and e- negative electrons conducting bodies. *
>>
>> *In a plasma tube, the plasma itself can be at 2700

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

Higgins—

I agree with your comment about a high voltage (short) at the beginning of the 
reaction in the QX reactor.  It is consistent with the flash of light which can 
be seen at the end of the reactor upon the initial power application.

Your assessment does not address the source of energy during the off phases of 
the control circuit.  I would argue that the reaction producing heat is 
occurring in the Ni electrode with the Li acting as a good convective heat 
transfer agent from the electrode to the outer circumference  of the reactor 
where the water cooling occurs.

The electric current is generated by the net positive charge  that results from 
the reaction that produces energetic alphas that cross the annular space where 
the dusty plasma exists and charge the outer surface of the reactor.

I disagree with Axil that the suncell hydrino reaction is like the QX reaction. 
 The spectra of the two reactions are not reported to be alike.

Bob Cook
.




From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 10:50:23 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

The QX is a downsized version of the SunCell with the plasma ball reduced to 
the size of a speck of dust. You can understand what is happening inside the QX 
by looking at what is happening inside the SunCell. The metal used in the QX is 
aluminum whereas the metal used to support the plasma inside the SunCell is 
silver.Lithium is not a reactant and remains in the vapor form. The hydrogen 
pressure is very high because the amount of solid fuel that is placed inside 
the QX must be substantial in order for the fuel loading to be manageable. 
Rossi cannot work with(load) nanograms of fuel

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Bob Higgins 
<rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
In the experiments I am aware of, waveforms were only tried as applied to the 
heater coils (or in my case to a magnetic field coil).  There was no evidence 
of enhanced XH.  This could be because the waveform was not well "coupled" to 
the active medium.  These were heat driven Parkhomov-like experiments.  In the 
case of others that have seen benefit from such waves, the stimulus was applied 
more directly to the reaction medium - electrolysis or to the hydrogenated 
wires.   I believe there could be benefit in such stimuli, but it would have to 
be appropriately coupled to the reaction.

In a conversation I was having with MFMP folks, I had this to say about what I 
thought was described for the QX reactor and power supply:

Since it has been suggested/said that Li is present inside the QX, during a 
discharge it will be in gas phase; and when it is turned OFF, it will condense 
on the inside of the tube and conduct across the electrodes.  Then, upon 
re-start, the tube will be shorted with this condensed Li metal path and a high 
current will be needed to heat the Li to boiling.  Once the Li path evaporates, 
the tube will have to be run in gas discharge mode.  So initially the tube is a 
short and needs a high current, low voltage to begin, and then it has to switch 
into gas discharge mode which is low current high voltage.  Also, in the gas 
discharge mode, the supply will have to be ballasted as a current source.  This 
is why the supply is complex, the waveform is complex, and why it is also 
difficult to characterize what energy has been supplied over time to the tube.  
There is the claim that there is balanced electron/ion flow.  That would be the 
H+ & Li+ positive ions and e- negative electrons conducting bodies.

In a plasma tube, the plasma itself can be at 2700K while the glass itself can 
be kept cool with water cooling.  The heat is transferred by the plasma atoms 
striking the glass, and there will be a cooler gas buffer zone around the 
inside of the glass where it is too cool to be in plasma state - insulating the 
core plasma discharge.  The higher the gas pressure, the more power that must 
be added to the plasma to compensate for the cooling of the glass tube on the 
plasma.  This tells me that the gas pressure inside the QX is probably pretty 
low, probably under 50 torr, and maybe more like 10 torr.  The problem you 
would have is keeping the Li from condensing on the glass tube in that cool 
zone and shorting out the plasma discharge.  It may take care of itself - as 
the lithium condenses on the glass, the plasma will go to it instead of the 
electrodes causing the Li to re-boil (sort of like an arc discharging to a 
piece of metal wire brought into the gap between a spark discharge).

Rossi has not demonstrated that his tube produces XE to any of us.  We 
basically have to take the unreliable, untrustworthy word of a technically 
incompetent scoundrel that he is producing any XE - and on a waveform that 
would be very difficult to characterize by someone that is technically sound.

On Thu, Nov 30,

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Axil Axil]

Andrea Rossi
November 29, 2017 at 4:32 PM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892=289#comment-1300730>

Italo R.:
Several days after the Stockholm demo we made a very important agreement,
that will make faster the start of a massive industrial production. These
few days have been momentous.
Warm regards,
A.R.

Andrea Rossi
November 30, 2017 at 2:01 AM
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892=289#comment-1300845>

Daniel G.Zavela:
Thank you for your kind attention.
During the test at the IVA I put the power at 30% to put the probability of
breaks at zero point. The product will perform better, also because now we
are focusing on the industrialization and this means also eliminate the
overheating problem. We are working along two lines: 1- industrialization
of the product, 2- industrialization of the production. These two processes
normally are completed up to 10 years ( the CEO of a car industry told me
up to 20 years), but we think it will take less than 2 years in our case. I
hope one year, but it will be rude.
The charge was standard.
Warm Regards,
A.R.


On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Rossi knows how to feed gadflies
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:14 PM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio
>
>
>
> Rossi has always used demos to drum up investor interest. Rossi is at a
> pause point in the engineering of the QX and is desirous of a manufacturing
> deal.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> the demo served no net purpose
>
>
>1. Andrea Rossi
>
> November 29, 2017 at 4:32 PM
> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892=289#comment-1300730>
>
> Italo R.:
> Several days after the Stockholm demo we made a very important agreement,
> that will make faster the start of a massive industrial production. These
> few days have been momentous.
> Warm regards,
> A.R.
>
> On the lenrforum, moderator Alan Smith said he talked to seven investors,
> some existing.
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Russ George]

Rossi knows how to feed gadflies

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:14 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

 

Rossi has always used demos to drum up investor interest. Rossi is at a pause 
point in the engineering of the QX and is desirous of a manufacturing deal.

 

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net 
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote:

 

the demo served no net purpose 

1.  Andrea Rossi 

November 29, 2017 at 4:32 PM 
<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892=289#comment-1300730>  

Italo R.:
Several days after the Stockholm demo we made a very important agreement, that 
will make faster the start of a massive industrial production. These few days 
have been momentous.
Warm regards,
A.R.

On the lenrforum, moderator Alan Smith said he talked to seven investors, some 
existing.

 

 

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Axil Axil]

Rossi has always used demos to drum up investor interest. Rossi is at a
pause point in the engineering of the QX and is desirous of a manufacturing
deal.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Adrian Ashfield 
wrote:

>
> the demo served no net purpose
>
>
>1. Andrea Rossi
>November 29, 2017 at 4:32 PM
>
> 
>Italo R.:
>Several days after the Stockholm demo we made a very important
>agreement, that will make faster the start of a massive industrial
>production. These few days have been momentous.
>Warm regards,
>A.R.
>
> On the lenrforum, moderator Alan Smith said he talked to seven investors,
> some existing.
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Adrian Ashfield]

 


 the demo served no net purpose 

 


Andrea Rossi

November 29, 2017 at 4:32 PM


Italo R.:
Several days after the Stockholm demo we made a very important agreement, that 
will make faster the start of a massive industrial production. These few days 
have been momentous.
Warm regards,
A.R.


On the lenrforum, moderator Alan Smith said he talked to seven investors, some 
existing.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Axil Axil]

The QX is a downsized version of the SunCell with the plasma ball reduced
to the size of a speck of dust. You can understand what is happening inside
the QX by looking at what is happening inside the SunCell. The metal used
in the QX is aluminum whereas the metal used to support the plasma inside
the SunCell is silver.Lithium is not a reactant and remains in the vapor
form. The hydrogen pressure is very high because the amount of solid fuel
that is placed inside the QX must be substantial in order for the fuel
loading to be manageable. Rossi cannot work with(load) nanograms of fuel

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Bob Higgins 
wrote:

> In the experiments I am aware of, waveforms were only tried as applied to
> the heater coils (or in my case to a magnetic field coil).  There was no
> evidence of enhanced XH.  This could be because the waveform was not well
> "coupled" to the active medium.  These were heat driven Parkhomov-like
> experiments.  In the case of others that have seen benefit from such waves,
> the stimulus was applied more directly to the reaction medium -
> electrolysis or to the hydrogenated wires.   I believe there could be
> benefit in such stimuli, but it would have to be appropriately coupled to
> the reaction.
>
> In a conversation I was having with MFMP folks, I had this to say about
> what I thought was described for the QX reactor and power supply:
>
>
> *Since it has been suggested/said that Li is present inside the QX, during
> a discharge it will be in gas phase; and when it is turned OFF, it will
> condense on the inside of the tube and conduct across the electrodes.
> Then, upon re-start, the tube will be shorted with this condensed Li metal
> path and a high current will be needed to heat the Li to boiling.  Once the
> Li path evaporates, the tube will have to be run in gas discharge mode.  So
> initially the tube is a short and needs a high current, low voltage to
> begin, and then it has to switch into gas discharge mode which is low
> current high voltage.  Also, in the gas discharge mode, the supply will
> have to be ballasted as a current source.  This is why the supply is
> complex, the waveform is complex, and why it is also difficult to
> characterize what energy has been supplied over time to the tube.  There is
> the claim that there is balanced electron/ion flow.  That would be the H+ &
> Li+ positive ions and e- negative electrons conducting bodies.*
>
> * In a plasma tube, the plasma itself can be at 2700K while the glass
> itself can be kept cool with water cooling.  The heat is transferred by the
> plasma atoms striking the glass, and there will be a cooler gas buffer zone
> around the inside of the glass where it is too cool to be in plasma state -
> insulating the core plasma discharge.  The higher the gas pressure, the
> more power that must be added to the plasma to compensate for the cooling
> of the glass tube on the plasma.  This tells me that the gas pressure
> inside the QX is probably pretty low, probably under 50 torr, and maybe
> more like 10 torr.  The problem you would have is keeping the Li from
> condensing on the glass tube in that cool zone and shorting out the plasma
> discharge.  It may take care of itself - as the lithium condenses on the
> glass, the plasma will go to it instead of the electrodes causing the Li to
> re-boil (sort of like an arc discharging to a piece of metal wire brought
> into the gap between a spark discharge).*
>
> * Rossi has not demonstrated that his tube produces XE to any of us.  We
> basically have to take the unreliable, untrustworthy word of a technically
> incompetent scoundrel that he is producing any XE - and on a waveform that
> would be very difficult to characterize by someone that is technically
> sound.*
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:31 AM, JonesBeene  wrote:
>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>
>> Have you (or MFMP) experimented with any variation of the Dardik
>> superwave?
>>
>>
>>
>> I think it is more than coincidence that Rossi, Brillouin, Kimmel,
>> Energetics etc, etc have employed interfering waveforms as the input power.
>>
>>
>>
>> Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, it is true that his PS
>> seems unusually lossy.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sadly, that is the most hopeful thing that anyone can honestly say about
>> it….
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Bob Higgins 
>>
>>
>>
>>- the demo served no net purpose - except possibly to those there
>>that were granted greater access to the data.  You and I should take it as
>>a presumed null experiment since there was inadequate data shared to show
>>any XE.
>>
>>
>>
>> JonesBeene wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>- The most important Euro Patent from Dardik, El-Boher et al entitled
>>"Pulsed low energy nuclear reaction power generators" EP 1656678 B1 with a
>>grant date of 2004. This is also known as the "superwave" patent. It is
>>similar and precedes the Brillouin IP - and will 

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[JonesBeene]

BTW here is another datum in the quest for provable LENR using superwaves, and 
it is a GRANTED US patent which cites the Dardik patent

https://encrypted.google.com/patents/US9540960

Nicolas Chauvin inventor. Low energy nuclear thermoelectric system  - Abstract
A low energy nuclear thermoelectric system for a vehicle which provides a 
cost-effective and sustainable means of transportation for long operation range 
with zero emission using an onboard low energy nuclear reaction thermal 
generator.

The USPTO is so unfriendly with anything which mentions LENR by name that 
getting this one granted is almost a miracle in itself.



Bob… Have you (or MFMP) experimented with any variation of the Dardik superwave?

I think it is more than coincidence that Rossi, Brillouin, Kimmel, Energetics 
etc, etc have employed interfering waveforms as the input power.

Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, it is true that his PS seems 
unusually lossy. 

Sadly, that is the most hopeful thing that anyone can honestly say about it….


From: Bob Higgins

➢ the demo served no net purpose - except possibly to those there that were 
granted greater access to the data.  You and I should take it as a presumed 
null experiment since there was inadequate data shared to show any XE.

JonesBeene wrote:

➢ The most important Euro Patent from Dardik, El-Boher et al entitled "Pulsed 
low energy nuclear reaction power generators" EP 1656678 B1 with a grant date 
of 2004. This is also known as the "superwave" patent. It is similar and 
precedes the Brillouin IP - and will also rain on the Godes parade, if it turns 
out that structured waveforms are the key to success.
 

[Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Bob Higgins]

In the experiments I am aware of, waveforms were only tried as applied to
the heater coils (or in my case to a magnetic field coil).  There was no
evidence of enhanced XH.  This could be because the waveform was not well
"coupled" to the active medium.  These were heat driven Parkhomov-like
experiments.  In the case of others that have seen benefit from such waves,
the stimulus was applied more directly to the reaction medium -
electrolysis or to the hydrogenated wires.   I believe there could be
benefit in such stimuli, but it would have to be appropriately coupled to
the reaction.

In a conversation I was having with MFMP folks, I had this to say about
what I thought was described for the QX reactor and power supply:


*Since it has been suggested/said that Li is present inside the QX, during
a discharge it will be in gas phase; and when it is turned OFF, it will
condense on the inside of the tube and conduct across the electrodes.
Then, upon re-start, the tube will be shorted with this condensed Li metal
path and a high current will be needed to heat the Li to boiling.  Once the
Li path evaporates, the tube will have to be run in gas discharge mode.  So
initially the tube is a short and needs a high current, low voltage to
begin, and then it has to switch into gas discharge mode which is low
current high voltage.  Also, in the gas discharge mode, the supply will
have to be ballasted as a current source.  This is why the supply is
complex, the waveform is complex, and why it is also difficult to
characterize what energy has been supplied over time to the tube.  There is
the claim that there is balanced electron/ion flow.  That would be the H+ &
Li+ positive ions and e- negative electrons conducting bodies.*

* In a plasma tube, the plasma itself can be at 2700K while the glass
itself can be kept cool with water cooling.  The heat is transferred by the
plasma atoms striking the glass, and there will be a cooler gas buffer zone
around the inside of the glass where it is too cool to be in plasma state -
insulating the core plasma discharge.  The higher the gas pressure, the
more power that must be added to the plasma to compensate for the cooling
of the glass tube on the plasma.  This tells me that the gas pressure
inside the QX is probably pretty low, probably under 50 torr, and maybe
more like 10 torr.  The problem you would have is keeping the Li from
condensing on the glass tube in that cool zone and shorting out the plasma
discharge.  It may take care of itself - as the lithium condenses on the
glass, the plasma will go to it instead of the electrodes causing the Li to
re-boil (sort of like an arc discharging to a piece of metal wire brought
into the gap between a spark discharge).*

* Rossi has not demonstrated that his tube produces XE to any of us.  We
basically have to take the unreliable, untrustworthy word of a technically
incompetent scoundrel that he is producing any XE - and on a waveform that
would be very difficult to characterize by someone that is technically
sound.*

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:31 AM, JonesBeene  wrote:

> Bob
>
>
>
> Have you (or MFMP) experimented with any variation of the Dardik superwave?
>
>
>
> I think it is more than coincidence that Rossi, Brillouin, Kimmel,
> Energetics etc, etc have employed interfering waveforms as the input power.
>
>
>
> Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, it is true that his PS
> seems unusually lossy.
>
>
>
> Sadly, that is the most hopeful thing that anyone can honestly say about
> it….
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Bob Higgins 
>
>
>
>- the demo served no net purpose - except possibly to those there that
>were granted greater access to the data.  You and I should take it as a
>presumed null experiment since there was inadequate data shared to show any
>XE.
>
>
>
> JonesBeene wrote:
>
>
>
>
>- The most important Euro Patent from Dardik, El-Boher et al entitled
>"Pulsed low energy nuclear reaction power generators" EP 1656678 B1 with a
>grant date of 2004. This is also known as the "superwave" patent. It is
>similar and precedes the Brillouin IP - and will also rain on the Godes
>parade, if it turns out that structured waveforms are the key to success.
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[JonesBeene]

Bob

Have you (or MFMP) experimented with any variation of the Dardik superwave?

I think it is more than coincidence that Rossi, Brillouin, Kimmel, Energetics 
etc, etc have employed interfering waveforms as the input power.

Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, it is true that his PS seems 
unusually lossy. 

Sadly, that is the most hopeful thing that anyone can honestly say about it….


From: Bob Higgins

➢ the demo served no net purpose - except possibly to those there that were 
granted greater access to the data.  You and I should take it as a presumed 
null experiment since there was inadequate data shared to show any XE.

JonesBeene wrote:

➢ The most important Euro Patent from Dardik, El-Boher et al entitled "Pulsed 
low energy nuclear reaction power generators" EP 1656678 B1 with a grant date 
of 2004. This is also known as the "superwave" patent. It is similar and 
precedes the Brillouin IP - and will also rain on the Godes parade, if it turns 
out that structured waveforms are the key to success.
 

[Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Bob Higgins]

To most of us here, the issue of patent infringement unimportant.
Infringement would only become an issue once the device was going to
product, and it would only go to product if it was usefully producing XE.
The real issue is that so little was demonstrated in this meeting that what
Rossi has could be anything from nothing (a funky looking resistor) to
anything you wish to imagine.  So, the demo served no net purpose - except
possibly to those there that were granted greater access to the data.  You
and I should take it as a presumed null experiment since there was
inadequate data shared to show any XE.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:33 AM, JonesBeene  wrote:

>
>
> “We may agree that the demo is crazy but is it crazy enough to have a
> chance of being correct ?”
>
>
>
> Ha - ‘Bohring’ as it may sound, that may be a decent summation of the
> current situation, but so is the observation that at least 60 watts
> electrical is going in from the wall and only 50 watts thermal is coming
> out, so there is no gain at all.
>
>
>
> It really doesn’t matter that the loss is in the power supply ! This
> particular kind of loss is unavoidable and must be included in the calcs.
>
>
>
> The only power measurement which is relevant is at the wall plug - since
> it is abundantly clear that at least two interfering frequencies are being
> used to produce a waveform, which is necessary and lossy. Rossi was hiding
> the waveform issue as far back as 5 years ago, and we know it is relevant.
> The Q-pulse which is part of Brillouin's IP is similar – very similar - but
> the original idea comes from Dardik and the Israeli company ENERGETICs,
> both now out of the picture.
>
>
>
> The most important Euro Patent from Dardik, El-Boher et al entitled
> "Pulsed low energy nuclear reaction power generators" EP 1656678 B1 with a
> grant date of 2004. This is also known as the "superwave" patent. It is
> similar and precedes the Brillouin IP - and will also rain on the Godes
> parade, if it turns out that structured waveforms are the key to success.
>
>
>
> Two relevant remaining questions are: can these structured waveforms be
> produced with less loss by using a dedicated power supply, and why does
> this demo of Rossi not infringe on the Dardik IP? Or on Brillouin’s similar
> IP for the Q-pulse?
>
>
>
> Dardik’s successors (including Mckubre who is on one of the old patent
> apps) along with Violante have already demonstrated small thermal gain with
> superwaves as far back as 2008. They are probably doing this in Texas, now
> as we speak and they are probably watching Rossi to see if he has made a
> breakthrough but he has not.
>
>
>
> No one issure who currently holds the basic superwave patent (since the
> demise of Energetics LLC) but the USPTO fees are being maintained, so
> somebody realizes the value. Bottom line - as always in measuring input
> power, when unusual waveforms and interfering waves are used as input power
> the losses in the power supply MUST BE included as part of input.
>
>
>
> This is likely to be exactly what SRI told Brillouion and it is probably
> why Godes has gone silent. The losses in the power supply for making
> superwaves cannot be lessened enough to show large gain. It is likely that
> both Godes and Rossi could minimize the losses somewhat, and show COP in
> the range of 1.5 to 2 but even then, they would be infringing on EP 1656678
> B1.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[JonesBeene]

“We may agree that the demo is crazy but is it crazy enough to have a chance of 
being correct ?”

Ha - ‘Bohring’ as it may sound, that may be a decent summation of the current 
situation, but so is the observation that at least 60 watts electrical is going 
in from the wall and only 50 watts thermal is coming out, so there is no gain 
at all.

It really doesn’t matter that the loss is in the power supply ! This particular 
kind of loss is unavoidable and must be included in the calcs.

The only power measurement which is relevant is at the wall plug - since it is 
abundantly clear that at least two interfering frequencies are being used to 
produce a waveform, which is necessary and lossy. Rossi was hiding the waveform 
issue as far back as 5 years ago, and we know it is relevant. The Q-pulse which 
is part of Brillouin's IP is similar – very similar - but the original idea 
comes from Dardik and the Israeli company ENERGETICs, both now out of the 
picture.

The most important Euro Patent from Dardik, El-Boher et al entitled "Pulsed low 
energy nuclear reaction power generators" EP 1656678 B1 with a grant date of 
2004. This is also known as the "superwave" patent. It is similar and precedes 
the Brillouin IP - and will also rain on the Godes parade, if it turns out that 
structured waveforms are the key to success.

Two relevant remaining questions are: can these structured waveforms be 
produced with less loss by using a dedicated power supply, and why does this 
demo of Rossi not infringe on the Dardik IP? Or on Brillouin’s similar IP for 
the Q-pulse? 

Dardik’s successors (including Mckubre who is on one of the old patent apps) 
along with Violante have already demonstrated small thermal gain with 
superwaves as far back as 2008. They are probably doing this in Texas, now as 
we speak and they are probably watching Rossi to see if he has made a 
breakthrough but he has not. 

No one issure who currently holds the basic superwave patent (since the demise 
of Energetics LLC) but the USPTO fees are being maintained, so somebody 
realizes the value. Bottom line - as always in measuring input power, when 
unusual waveforms and interfering waves are used as input power the losses in 
the power supply MUST BE included as part of input. 

This is likely to be exactly what SRI told Brillouion and it is probably why 
Godes has gone silent. The losses in the power supply for making superwaves 
cannot be lessened enough to show large gain. It is likely that both Godes and 
Rossi could minimize the losses somewhat, and show COP in the range of 1.5 to 2 
but even then, they would be infringing on EP 1656678 B1.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[ROGER ANDERTON]

Bohr supposedly said variants of: We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. 
The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of 
being correct.https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Niels_Bohr
As regards the mess in physics; Bohr, Heisenberg, Feynman etc were all working 
from Unified field theory that was published in 1758 in Boscovich's book "A 
theory of Natural Philosophy..." It used to be taught to physics students in 
19th century, but   was cut-out in the 20th century to make room for new topics.
It is the modern atomic theory: that matter made mostly out of space and a few 
particles; and physics students are not told whose theory that is. 

latest talk by Dragoslav explains Quantum physics been misunderstood:
Stoiljkovich Dragoslav: Charge percolation mechanism of olefins polymerization

  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
||  
Stoiljkovich Dragoslav: Charge percolation mechanism of olefins polymerization
 Stoiljkovich Dragoslav: Charge percolation mechanism of olefins polymerization 
Paper: The charge percolation mec...  |   |

  |

  |

 
previous talk explains what is missed out from physics education:
>From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic

  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
||  
>From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoilj...
 "From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory": talk by retired Professor 
Dragoslav Stoiljkovi...  |   |

  |

  |

 

So, its most physicists having amnesia; not being aware of the history of their 
own subject.
Ioan Has paper: electromagnetism connected to gravity by Boscovich's theory:
A Theoretical Confirmation of the Gravitation New Origin Having a Dipolar 
Electrical Nature with Coulomb Law Corrected

  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
|   |  
A Theoretical Confirmation of the Gravitation New Origin Having a Dipolar E...
 By Ioan Has The paper starts by analyzing the actual justification of the 
separation existing between electrical and gravita...  |   |

  |

  |

 



 

On Wednesday, 29 November 2017, 19:44, Jed Rothwell  
wrote:
 

 Nigel Dyer  wrote:

I've sat through a number of talks at fringe science conferences that were 
modelled on the two excellent you tube videos. The speakers usually give every 
impression that they fully believe the nonsense that they are presenting is 
correct.

They probably do believe it. But you should bear in mind that the problem might 
be on your end. Unfamiliar ideas often sound like nonsense, yet they sometimes 
turn out to be right.
Regarding ideas that seem wrong and turn out to be wrong, see the marvelous 
quote at the end of this essay, p. 13:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJlessonsfro.pdf

See also this book, which I recommend: "Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin 
of Error," by Kathryn Schulz. This begins with a quote from Franklin, which I 
think describes one of the reasons people are seduced into believing errors:


Perhaps the history of the errors of mankind, all things considered, is more 
valuable and interesting than that of their discoveries. Truth is uniform and 
narrow; it constantly exists, and does not seem to require so much an active 
energy, as a passive aptitude of soul in order to encounter it. But error is 
endlessly diversified; it has no reality, but is the pure and simple creation 
of the mind that invents it. In this field, the soul has room enough to expand 
herself, to display all her boundless faculties, and all her beautiful and 
interesting extravagancies and absurdities.
—Benjamin Franklin, Report of Dr. Benjamin Franklin, and Other Commissioners, 
Charged by the King of France, with the Examination of the Animal Magnetism, as 
Now Practiced in Paris (1784)

- Jed


   

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Jed Rothwell]

Nigel Dyer  wrote:

I've sat through a number of talks at fringe science conferences that were
> modelled on the two excellent you tube videos. The speakers usually give
> every impression that they fully believe the nonsense that they are
> presenting is correct.


They probably do believe it. But you should bear in mind that the problem
might be on your end. Unfamiliar ideas often sound like nonsense, yet they
sometimes turn out to be right.

Regarding ideas that seem wrong and turn out to be wrong, see the marvelous
quote at the end of this essay, p. 13:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJlessonsfro.pdf

See also this book, which I recommend: "Being Wrong: Adventures in the
Margin of Error," by Kathryn Schulz. This begins with a quote from
Franklin, which I think describes one of the reasons people are seduced
into believing errors:

Perhaps the history of the errors of mankind, all things considered, is
more valuable and interesting than that of their discoveries. Truth is
uniform and narrow; it constantly exists, and does not seem to require so
much an active energy, as a passive aptitude of soul in order to encounter
it. But error is endlessly diversified; it has no reality, but is the pure
and simple creation of the mind that invents it. In this field, the soul
has room enough to expand herself, to display all her boundless faculties,
and all her beautiful and interesting extravagancies and absurdities.

—Benjamin Franklin, Report of Dr. Benjamin Franklin, and Other
Commissioners, Charged by the King of France, with the Examination of the
Animal Magnetism, as Now Practiced in Paris (1784)

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Adrian Ashfield]

"he “ought to have” seen something valid, but if so, he has done a grand job of 
hiding it and making success look exactly like fraud looks."

You can tell what good job he is doing because he isn't giving any more demos 
and is not asking the public for a dime.  Obviously a brand be scam where you 
don;t make any money.  Genius!

RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[JonesBeene]

From: Nigel Dyer

➢ There must be some fascinating psychology at  work.  I assume that it has a 
syndrome name. If not then I am sure we 
could give it one.

Agreed. There is Borderline Personality Disorder" (BPD) and check out the old 
Essay on the Leviton lie, from our mystery moderator Bill Beaty. The last part 
covers many bases.
http://amasci.com/maglev/levbill1.html

Curiously, I am reading “Two kinds of Truth” right now, and in the context of 
“alternative facts” it is arguable that a case can be made for almost any false 
proposition, including that Rossi really has something this time. In fact, 
since he is in a field where modest thermal anomalies have been shown in the 
past, he “ought to have” seen something valid, but if so, he has done a grand 
job of hiding it and making success look exactly like fraud looks.

“Munchausen syndrome by proxy” is another  a well-known mental health problem 
in which a caregiver secretly harms a patient in order to get credit for 
discovering the fake illness (which was in fact caused by the caregiver). Is 
this a variant? 

There is weird transactional similarity in Rossi’s irrational desire to be 
recognized as a great inventor, even with no qualifications and in the face of 
past failures despite the harm that it does to his loyal followers.  He has an 
uncanny recognition for the fact that some target scientists want to see a 
particular outcome so badly that they will believe almost anything he says. The 
hilarious episode with Kulander and the Nobel prize is emblematic on how far 
removed Rossi is from reality. One hopes it did not hasten his demise.

But the really pathetic thing is the mindset of his a few of his sycophants, 
one of whom even refused to believe (in an earlier thread on vortex) that Rossi 
could be wearing a wig, back when the first picture emerged.

Why? I suppose that a wig is itself symbolic of Rossi’s pathology. It’s kind of 
a symbol of fakery and (lost) vigor but is completely unnecessary for a great 
inventor, a few of whom have turned the problem into a status symbol or even 
into fringe IP …

https://thisdayinbaldhistory.wordpress.com/tag/inventors/

BTW – many of us on this forum, present company included, are well on the way 
to baldness but have a different (couldn’t care less) attitude about the need 
to hide it.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Nigel Dyer]

I've sat through a number of talks at fringe science conferences that 
were modelled on the two excellent you tube videos. The speakers usually 
give every impression that they fully believe the nonsense that they are 
presenting is correct.  There must be some fascinating psychology at 
work.  I assume that it has a syndrome name. If not then I am sure we 
could give it one.


Nigel

On 29/11/2017 15:39, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Here is a copy of the video of Rossi's D show with the full audio 
track:


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ya7fcYQhOOQo8a7EDNPHma5r25eJvxDY/view

The version now at YouTube has chunks of the audio track cut out. 
Someone at LENR-forum was kind enough to upload the previous version 
with the full audio track. It will be available for a limited time, so 
download it if you want it.


Here are two semi-comprehensive descriptions of Rossi's theory as it 
applies to automotive transmissions and big data. In the first video, 
be sure to see the repair section starting at 1:55.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzHq1Ssi0r8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSJsuJOk1DA

- Jed

[Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

[Jed Rothwell]

Here is a copy of the video of Rossi's D show with the full audio track:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ya7fcYQhOOQo8a7EDNPHma5r25eJvxDY/view

The version now at YouTube has chunks of the audio track cut out. Someone
at LENR-forum was kind enough to upload the previous version with the full
audio track. It will be available for a limited time, so download it if you
want it.

Here are two semi-comprehensive descriptions of Rossi's theory as it
applies to automotive transmissions and big data. In the first video, be
sure to see the repair section starting at 1:55.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzHq1Ssi0r8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSJsuJOk1DA

- Jed