[Vo]:Update to Rossi 6 Oct 2011 Experiment Data Review
My review at: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Rossi6Oct2011Review.pdf has been updated. Improved graph formats were provided. I will be available to discuss this once my finite element analysis is done. Meanwhile, I'll hopefully resume lurk mode. A significant part of the update is inclusion of the following sections: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIVE CONTROL To make any sense of the data with a non-nuclear explanation, it appears the electric heating power is separated into two parts, one part which heats the water directly, and one part which heats an internal metal mass. In addition, it appears there needs to be an active control which affects the thermal conductivity between a large thermal mass and the water, and thus division of the input power into a third part. This control must produce minimum thermal resistance between a hot thermal mass and the water when no power is applied to it. Further, it must be controlled with about 300 mA * 240 V = 7.2 watts of power, because the power from the “frequency generator” must be enough to regulate the thermal output power. When main heater power was cut and when the “frequency generator” power was cut, there was an immediate surge of thermal power out. In both cases, a power cut to the heater(s), and a power cut to the frequency generator, a large thermal pulse resulted immediately upon the power cut. One means of achieving the necessary power control is to use the actuator from a zone valve to make or release contact between large area (e.g. 29 cm by 29 cm) slabs of thermal conductors. This can be accomplished by spring loading the slabs to a closed position and using the actuator from a zone valve (.e.g. Taco Power Head) to press the plates apart. A typical US residential zone valve operates in the appropriate power range, and is activated by about 10 V at 1 A. The power is applied to a resistive material which expands thermally to open a zone valve. In a hot environment such an actuator could expand with less than normal power. An alternative to changing slab separation is to control convective flow of a thermal transfer fluid. In this case when power is applied then flow must be cut off. DYNAMIC FEA SIMULATION A dynamic linear FEA simulation program is being developed to look at potential thermal storage mechanisms. A sample of some run input data is located here: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/RptR4 Report of the results will be made separately from this review. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
[Vo]:Update to Rossi 6 Oct 2011 Experiment Data Review
My review at: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Rossi6Oct2011Review.pdf has been updated. Improved graph formats were provided. I will be available to discuss this once my finite element analysis is done. Meanwhile, I'll hopefully resume lurk mode. A significant part of the update is inclusion of the following sections: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIVE CONTROL To make any sense of the data with a non-nuclear explanation, it appears the electric heating power is separated into two parts, one part which heats the water directly, and one part which heats an internal metal mass. In addition, it appears there needs to be an active control which affects the thermal conductivity between a large thermal mass and the water, and thus division of the input power into a third part. This control must produce minimum thermal resistance between a hot thermal mass and the water when no power is applied to it. Further, it must be controlled with about 300 mA * 240 V = 7.2 watts of power, because the power from the “frequency generator” must be enough to regulate the thermal output power. When main heater power was cut and when the “frequency generator” power was cut, there was an immediate surge of thermal power out. In both cases, a power cut to the heater(s), and a power cut to the frequency generator, a large thermal pulse resulted immediately upon the power cut. One means of achieving the necessary power control is to use the actuator from a zone valve to make or release contact between large area (e.g. 29 cm by 29 cm) slabs of thermal conductors. This can be accomplished by spring loading the slabs to a closed position and using the actuator from a zone valve (.e.g. Taco Power Head) to press the plates apart. A typical US residential zone valve operates in the appropriate power range, and is activated by about 10 V at 1 A. The power is applied to a resistive material which expands thermally to open a zone valve. In a hot environment such an actuator could expand with less than normal power. An alternative to changing slab separation is to control convective flow of a thermal transfer fluid. In this case when power is applied then flow must be cut off. DYNAMIC FEA SIMULATION A dynamic linear FEA simulation program is being developed to look at potential thermal storage mechanisms. A sample of some run input data is located here: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/RptR4 Report of the results will be made separately from this review. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
[Vo]:Update to Rossi 6 Oct 2011 Experiment Data Review
This post is not archiving for some reason. I have inserted a blank into the URLs as a test. My review at: http://www.mta online.net/~hheffner/Rossi6Oct2011Review.pdf has been updated. Improved graph formats were provided. I will be available to discuss this once my finite element analysis is done. Meanwhile, I'll hopefully resume lurk mode. A significant part of the update is inclusion of the following sections: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIVE CONTROL To make any sense of the data with a non-nuclear explanation, it appears the electric heating power is separated into two parts, one part which heats the water directly, and one part which heats an internal metal mass. In addition, it appears there needs to be an active control which affects the thermal conductivity between a large thermal mass and the water, and thus division of the input power into a third part. This control must produce minimum thermal resistance between a hot thermal mass and the water when no power is applied to it. Further, it must be controlled with about 300 mA * 240 V = 7.2 watts of power, because the power from the “frequency generator” must be enough to regulate the thermal output power. When main heater power was cut and when the “frequency generator” power was cut, there was an immediate surge of thermal power out. In both cases, a power cut to the heater(s), and a power cut to the frequency generator, a large thermal pulse resulted immediately upon the power cut. One means of achieving the necessary power control is to use the actuator from a zone valve to make or release contact between large area (e.g. 29 cm by 29 cm) slabs of thermal conductors. This can be accomplished by spring loading the slabs to a closed position and using the actuator from a zone valve (.e.g. Taco Power Head) to press the plates apart. A typical US residential zone valve operates in the appropriate power range, and is activated by about 10 V at 1 A. The power is applied to a resistive material which expands thermally to open a zone valve. In a hot environment such an actuator could expand with less than normal power. An alternative to changing slab separation is to control convective flow of a thermal transfer fluid. In this case when power is applied then flow must be cut off. DYNAMIC FEA SIMULATION A dynamic linear FEA simulation program is being developed to look at potential thermal storage mechanisms. A sample of some run input data is located here: http://www.mta online.net/~hheffner/RptR4 Report of the results will be made separately from this review. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mta online.net/~hheffner/
Re: [Vo]:Update to Rossi 6 Oct 2011 Experiment Data Review
Hello Horace, I have generated an additional review which I plan to publish soon. The new analysis I have completed shows absolute proof of LENR by my thinking. I found a way to read the data that is very interesting. Dave -Original Message- From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net To: Vortex-L vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thu, Oct 27, 2011 3:42 pm Subject: [Vo]:Update to Rossi 6 Oct 2011 Experiment Data Review My review at: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Rossi6Oct2011Review.pdf has been updated. Improved graph formats were provided. I will be vailable to discuss this once my finite element analysis is done. eanwhile, I'll hopefully resume lurk mode. A significant part of the update is inclusion of the following sections: snip. Horace Heffner ttp://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
