the story behind free pdfs of 34 cold fusion papers in Current Science 104(4) 574-7, 2015.02.25: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax: Rich Murray 2015.02.24
Replicable cold fusion experiment: heat/helium ratio, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax, Current Science 104(4) 574-7, 2015.02.25 free pdfs of 34 papers: Rich Murray 2015.02.24 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/02/replicable-cold-fusion-experiment.html Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com [newvortex] < newvor...@yahoogroups.com> 4:59 PM (5 hours ago) Tuesday. 2015.02.24 to newvortex The entire journal: http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/toc.php?vol=108&issue=04 The special section alone, 34 papers: http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/feat.php?feature=Special%20Section:%20Low%20Energy%20Nuclear%20Reactions&featid=10094 And, of course, my paper: "Replicable cold fusion experiment: heat/helium ratio" http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/108/04/0574.pdf All the papers in that section may be discussed on Wikversity: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusion/Current_Science https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_Science Some general information about this. Current Science is a multidisciplinary journal established in 1932, published by the Current Science Association in collaboration with the Indian Academy of Sciences. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Academy_of_Sciences> Last year, the editors of the section solicited papers from researchers in the field of LENR. These papers went through two reviews, first by the special section editors and then, if the editors decided to forward the paper, by a normal peer reviewer assigned by Current Science. The anonymous reviewer of my paper was familiar with physics and not with cold fusion, and was skeptical at first. Yes, I modified my paper extensively in response to his critique and it is, no doubt, better for it. Apparently, he was convinced, he gave a glowing recommendation for publication. There are some very good papers in this collection, and others that are brief reports on activity in various nations or organizations. I specially recommend McKubre's paper, "Cold fusion: comments on the state of scientific proof" http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/108/04/0495.pdf But there are *many* excellent papers. One might notice that we are not being shy about using the term "cold fusion." Times change. It's fusion, get over it. ("Fusion" is a result, not a mechanism. The mechanism is a mystery.) Posted by: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>
