A. Xaaq -- zq q
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 24, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Oustanding work Ruby.
Does anyone know which paper of Roy Stanley he is referring to. Sorry, I am
not very informed about some of the work Ed Storms is referring to.
Jojo
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Emeka Okafor emeka.oka...@gmail.com wrote:
A. Xaaq -- zq q
Sent from my iPhone
I guess it's more than the mapping s/w, eh?
Wow. Please forgive me if you haven't seen Dr. Edmund Storms video
interview, but that was one the most convincing theoretical arguments for
as type of fracto-fusion cold fusion event I've seen. It makes perfect
sense. I've studied enough electron-micrographs to know that the type of
Is Iron another catalyst of Rossi? If Im not wrong he said that there are
more than one catalyst
What is the isotopic quantities found in the ash
from Rossi?
Arnaud
_
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: samedi 25 août 2012 06:33
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
Just out of curiosity, does the Thermite reaction work with nickel, i.e.
something like ... Fe2O3 + 3 Ni = 3 NiO + 2 Fe?
Jeff
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.bewrote:
Is Iron another catalyst of Rossi? If I’m not wrong he said that there
are more than one
Good idea! Im not sure Fe2O3 + 3 Ni = 3 NiO + 2 Fe is exothermic or even
if this reaction may exist.
_
From: Jeff Berkowitz [mailto:pdx...@gmail.com]
Sent: samedi 25 août 2012 20:11
To: arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:video: An Explanation of
My belief now is it does not exist (i.e. not exothermic). Using The Google,
I found one reference on the internets to this reaction:
3 NiO + 2 Al = 3 Ni + Al2O3 + heat
I.e. nickel oxide forming the oxidizer. Which suggests the one I mentioned
isn't thermodynamically possible. But I'm not
This video is a good summary of the last evolutions of Edmund Storm's
theory. Thank you, Edmund and Ruby to make it happen.
I've a bit of concern regarding neutrino emission. Edmund said that no
neutrino has been seen and his theory explains it why. That's good point.
Nevertheless he has
Having a neutrino detector in your lab would be quite an undertaking. The
small one in Sudbury is 40 feet in diameter and full of D2O. Back of the
envelope, I make its weight about 1000 metric tons (which is about 2.2
million pounds for metrically-challenged people).
Jeff
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at
It seems that Ed Storms is not the first worker to speculate about the
important roll that cracks play in cold fusion. I ran into another. Here is
what Kenneth Shoulders says in this reference
http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/mar2/fox.htm
about cracks in palladium:
*It is possible that many
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:33:14 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?
See below?
Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)
2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = iron.
The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
together with a mix of the first 19 of the lightest elements.
Yes, Rossi's info
And it is also not consistent with the Defkalion analyses.
It is a complex issue.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products.
is it coherent with DGT claims about isotopic anomalies ?
2012/8/24 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
consistent to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products.
These reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc,
Ruby Carat wrote:
. and I'm going to send any individuals interested in discussing the work
here to this thread. Is that illegal on Vortex?
Well, no, it's not illegal, but if your send a troll or someone like
MaryYugo over here, we might have to tickle you until Rossi does a proper
test to
Oustanding work Ruby.
Does anyone know which paper of Roy Stanley he is referring to. Sorry, I am
not very informed about some of the work Ed Storms is referring to.
Jojo
PS: I will write some opinions about this video in my thread. I did not want
to interject my ideas here so as not to
Ed's theory can not explain the lack of radiation. The ONLY way a nuclear
reaction can proceed without producing radiation is in the case where the range
of the strong nuclear force exceeds that of the coulombic.
Ed start by assuming that the range of the force fields is not a conserved
I agree with Frank.
I will only add that a local STRONG QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL FORCE can also
red-shift any energy that escapes its grasp, resulting in weak radiation to
outside observers. It also has the advantage of creating collective, high
energy blue-shifted radiation near the SOURCE of
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:23 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Well, no, it’s not illegal, but if your send a troll or someone like
MaryYugo over here, we might have to tickle you until Rossi does a proper
test to satisfy the Collective!
That could be cruel, unusual, possibly
In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are
one-hundredthousandth of the amount of fusion of deurium and so contribute
little in the way of net heat out they are just a side reaction but an
important one as they provide testament of a nuclear reaction. The
transmutation
have dislocations been considered?
http://www.ic.arizona.edu/ic/mse257/class_notes/disclocation.html
http://kasap3.usask.ca/images/photos/dislocation.gif
harry
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Kelley Trezise ktrez2...@ssvecnet.com wrote:
In what proportions are these transmutations occuring.
Perhaps of relevance is the H-Chain modeling described in this paper:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.1746v1.pdf
The homogeneous (i.e., equispaced), linear, and peri-
odic chain of Hydrogen atoms (hereafter, the H-chain) is
commonly believed to be the simplest physical system de-
scribed by the
Kelley Trezise ktrez2...@ssvecnet.com wrote:
**
In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are
one-hundredthousandth of the amount of fusion of deurium and so contribute
little in the way of net heat out . . .
As far as I know, they contribute far less energy than the
An alert viewer let me know about the 10^12 is a trillion typo.
I HAD to upload a fresh vid, couldn't get the tweak right in Youtube
Storms interview UPDATED video link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNodilc6su0
Getting to the youtube, most people will be able to find it.
Woo hoo - the
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
An alert viewer let me know about the 10^12 is a trillion typo.
Like I said in my private message, what's an order of magnitude error
among friends?
I also edited the DGT post but it won't reappear until the moderators
approve the
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on,
Great, and how much of the environment did we just irradiate with high
level gammas?
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:09:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Great, and how much of the environment did we just irradiate with high
level gammas?
Prompt gammas are not a problem, because they can be absorbed and converted to
heat immediately. It's radioactive nuclei
Le Aug 24, 2012 à 11:46 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com a écrit :
That would include transmuting deuterium into tritium, by the way.
This is always a possibility, of course. But I think it would require either a
transition from D to 3He and then a very slow inverse beta decay, or,
10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?
Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)
2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = iron.
Cheers: Axil
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to
I have uploaded an interview with Edmund Storms on his new theory of
what starts the cold fusion reaction.
http://coldfusionnow.org/an-explanation-of-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-cold-fusion-by-edmund-storms/
I'll be on the road, in my truck, headed to the Bay area (San Francisco
California
31 matches
Mail list logo
