Technically, not a LED:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED
seems to meet your description 'cept for the intensity.
T
not catch any
statement about changing wavelength or frequency. Did I miss it?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 6:21 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A123 Systems rescued by China's Wanxiang
Technically
Color change is cutting edge:
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/07/researchers-pave-way-for-much-brighter-oleds/
T
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A123 Systems rescued by China's Wanxiang
Color change is cutting edge:
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/07/researchers-pave-way-for-much-brighte
r-oleds/
T
wasn't A123 the builder of efficient LiFePO4 accumulators, good candidate
for rough accumulators, less dangerous (don't explode, or burn), near as
efficient, especially on duration...
I don't understand why LiFePO4 does not get success. it is easy technology,
easier to use than LiPoly or LiIon+Co
5 matches
Mail list logo