RE: [Vo]:Storms comments on Rossi

2011-03-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 06:37 PM 3/3/2011, you wrote:

BTW - If you haven't seen it, here is the preliminary WIPO rejection notice
of most of the claims of the Rossi patent

http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/Rossi-Patent-Application-WO-2009-125444-PrelimReport.pdf


Just not surprising at all. My hypothesis would be that Rossi 
expected this, and filed the patent only to create publicity. The 
disclosures in the patent were not adequate, at all.






Re: [Vo]:Storms comments on Rossi

2011-03-04 Thread Jed Rothwell

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:

Just not surprising at all. My hypothesis would be that Rossi expected 
this, and filed the patent only to create publicity.


Bad publicity. Frankly, it makes him look stupid. I cannot think of any 
reason why he would want to do that.



The disclosures in the patent were not adequate, at all.


They were not.

Why not assume that things are as they appear to be? Why not take things 
at face value? Rossi does a poor job expressing himself in his blog. I 
suppose he wrote a bad patent because he is not good at writing patents. 
He often publishes sloppy mistakes such as the wrong name of the company 
in Greece, and he makes weird claims such as having a PhD from a defunct 
diploma mill. It seems clear to me that he is bad at public relations. 
He does not care about PR, his image, or people's opinions. He may have 
a good business strategy but effective communication is not part of it.


I don't think he is playing mind games. I think he is a technical genius 
but that does not mean he is good at PR or business strategy. Beware of 
ascribing multiple talents to people who happen to excel in one 
particular area.


- Jed



RE: [Vo]:Storms comments on Rossi

2011-03-03 Thread Jones Beene
BTW - If you haven't seen it, here is the preliminary WIPO rejection notice
of most of the claims of the Rossi patent

http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/36/Rossi-Patent-Application-WO-20
09-125444-PrelimReport.pdf