Re: [Vo]: Re: How Can You Be in Two Places at Once . . .

[Terry Blanton]

More detail here:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003articleID=A4DC24B0-E7F2-99DF-32F55BBC5A8AD953

http://tinyurl.com/uvjvy

Terry

On 11/9/06, Kyle R. Mcallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:40 AM
Subject: [Vo]: How Can You Be in Two Places at Once . . .


 The quantum world is about to get bigger
 01 November 2006
 From New Scientist Print Edition.

 The quantum world is about to get bigger thanks to a technique that
 will allow objects big enough to see with the naked eye to exist in
 two places at once.

...You can of course, only see the mirror and not the magical quantum
effects, but only detect them with XYZ unspecified measurement techniques,
whose results will no doubt be debatable as to exactly what was observed.
And then observing it will affect itad nauseam ad tedium ad
infinatum you see where this is going.

If they can show me a mirror that is undeniably in two places at once, then
I will believe this. Until then, I'll stick to commanding electrons to do my
bidding in classically-designed equipment.

Remember...no matter where you gothere you are. -Buckaroo Banzai

--Kyle, definitely in one place, and not both or neither.

Re: [Vo]: Re: How Can You Be in Two Places at Once . . .

[Terry Blanton]

In 1978, my then wife was studying theatre at Georgia State
University.  We actually transcribed Nick Danger, Third Eye to make
a script for a play at GSU.  It was a hit.

It also played at the local artsy-fartsy theatre where the critics
said that it was amusing, but why do it?

sigh

Terry

On 11/9/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

How Can You Be in Two Places at Once . . .

. . . when you're not anywhere at all.


Oh my ... and with a sound byte from none other than Defective
Nick Danger.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

... to paraphrase Nick, the correct answer is:
 don't cut yourself off at the past