Re: [Vo]:A though experiment and discussion that should be important in my view
The point is that as you shrink it energy density will increase and I simply assume there is a limit for how much density space can take. I alsa suggest that this limit is consistent with lorentz transformations as it would not make sense if this depends on which frame the observer has. This also meen a finite size of the structure and hence not a point and not spherical. That's why you need to overlay multiple copies of it and symmetrize. You could see these arguments as a foundation for Mills GUTCP. Here is my blog where you can read more about the idea http://itampe.com/a-comment-on-special-relativity.html On Sat, 6 May 2023, 02:10 Robin wrote: > In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:27 > +0200: > Hi Stefan, > > Though I find it difficult to visualize, I think that if you allow the > major radius of a toroid to shrink to zero, you > end up with a sphere. > Cloud storage:- > > Unsafe, Slow, Expensive > > ...pick any three. > >
Re: [Vo]:A though experiment and discussion that should be important in my view
In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:27 +0200: Hi Stefan, Though I find it difficult to visualize, I think that if you allow the major radius of a toroid to shrink to zero, you end up with a sphere. Cloud storage:- Unsafe, Slow, Expensive ...pick any three.
Re: [Vo]:A though experiment and discussion that should be important in my view
In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:27 +0200: Hi Stefan, Re. gravity, see https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/2032981/downloads/2032981.pdf Cloud storage:- Unsafe, Slow, Expensive ...pick any three.
Re: [Vo]:A though experiment and discussion that should be important in my view
In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:27 +0200: Hi Stefan, You write:- "Now the total amount of energy is 2u if we assume equal amount of electrical energy as magnetic energy, hence if we integrate. F = Utot/va But according to special relativity we have, Utot = mc So, F = mc/va No put v = c we see, F = ma" However I think Utot = mc^2 (not mc) and setting v=c => F = m/a not m*a If the we instead start with Utot = mc^2 we get F = mc^2/va which after substituting c for v => F = mc/a. ...so how does c/a magically become a? ;) Cloud storage:- Unsafe, Slow, Expensive ...pick any three.
