Sorry the link should have been as follows:
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/vega
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 4:13 AM Axil Axil wrote:
> Here is a system that produces EVOs. The EVO is unstable and will explode
> when it exceeds 100 microns in size. This explosion was names "Bosenova"
> because
Here is a system that produces EVOs. The EVO is unstable and will explode
when it exceeds 100 microns in size. This explosion was names "Bosenova"
because the tachyon condensate explodes seeding out a cloud of 10^23
electrons more or less at the speed of light when their charge and mass is
These bubbles are tachyonic which makes the bubbles replete with negative
energy. The bubbles can be considered a false vacuum since the tachyons (Cavity
Higgs-Polaritons) are able to modify the Higgs field.
Cavity Higgs-Polaritons
https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.03377
Physicists Say They've Created
How do these bubbles of space really differ from the concept of a dynamical
space-fluidic medium?
BTW my speculation based on some stuff Bob Greenyer has reported is that in
a vacuum these EVO's exist but are empty and don't do anything till the
moment hydrogen or other elements are let in.
That
The Exotic Vacuum Object EVO is a bubble of Anti-de Sitter space (AdS
space) that is formed through the condensation of tachyons made available
within a superconducting seeded environment. Inside the bubble of AdS space
(EVO), there exists another universe that is incompatible with our universe
speeds?
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: Robert Lee<mailto:mrrobert...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 12:29 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How the Holmlid mechanism wo
They are more like geometric vibrations from the quantum vacuum fluctuations
with miniature black holes at the vortices.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:20 PM, Robin
wrote: In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:49:49
+0100:
Hi,
[snip]
mo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *Re: [Vo]:How the Holmlid mechanism works
What is a free electron, i.e. as used in an x-ray tube?
Good question!
Live - all the chemistry that forms/carries it - happens between the
electron and the proton (inside nuclei). So we stay in between.
Physi
for the force?
Bob Cook
From: Jürg Wyttenbach<mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 3:28 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How the Holmlid mechanism works
What is a free electron, i.e. as used in an x-ray tube?
Good que
The electron orbits are (1x1)X(0.5x0.5) as the third wave is split over
two orbits what one also sees in the electron g-factor.
An electron in resonance with a proton binds with all three waves- The
(0.5x0.5) interaction shares 1FC orbit with the proton. 1FC orbits are
virtual charge orbits
Jones, your comment made me laugh out loudGlad someone still has a sense
of humor in these times.
On Thursday, February 25, 2021, 04:45:27 PM GMT+1, JonesBeene
wrote:
Could it really be that simple?
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:28:36 +0100:
Hi Jürg,
Next question. Can a "fat photon" bind to a proton resonance? IOW are you sure
the "fat photon" loses it's
identity/internal structure when bound in an atom?
>What is a free electron, i.e. as used in an x-ray
What is a free electron, i.e. as used in an x-ray tube?
Good question!
Live - all the chemistry that forms/carries it - happens between the
electron and the proton (inside nuclei). So we stay in between.
Physically a free electron behaves like a fat photon with a locked in
wave that is
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:05:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>No the electron has no stable strong force radius.
>
>You can only measure the electron g-factor, where as you can get it from
>a metric transformation from the proton strong force equation.
>
>Physics will
The equation of a Light Leptonic Magnetic Monopole
and its Experimental Aspects
Georges Lochak
Urutskoiev produces a boatload of math that shows in part that the EVO is a
tachyon.
This is a smoking gun for tachyonic condensation which shows in detail the
inner structure of the EVO.
This is the
No the electron has no stable strong force radius.
You can only measure the electron g-factor, where as you can get it from
a metric transformation from the proton strong force equation.
Physics will change. More radically as some will like.
J.W.
On 26.02.2021 19:54, Robin wrote:a
In reply
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:06:39 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>The electron is an exact resonance of the proton. We can calculate all
>electron properties from the proton properties.
>
>This is how nature works along magnetism.
>
>
>J.W.
Does that mean you could also
Jpones—
I do not consider it is that simple!
Bob Cook
PS: However I applaud Axil’s work to simplify the SM.
BC
From: JonesBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:45 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:How
The electron is an exact resonance of the proton. We can calculate all
electron properties from the proton properties.
This is how nature works along magnetism.
J.W.
On 26.02.2021 08:20, Robin wrote:
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:49:49 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
All
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:49:49 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>All particles we know are resonances of the proton.
Don't you think a free electron is a bit light weight to be a proton resonance?
Maybe structures other than protons are also possible?
All particles we know are resonances of the proton. CERN accelerates
protons. What else do you think??
You need 53MeV to resonantly split a proton. This can be calculated with
secondary school math. Nothing comes out of pure energy - may be wet
dreams.
Pure energy has no structure. Please
The generation of strange quarks implies that extreme energy production
beyond what nuclear binding energy is capable of providing is occuring.
The energy production levels of an accelerator is more likely to be
occurring. The mesons are being formed from a source of pure energy and
lots of it.
Axil:
Quarks are non existent particles. They are just a mathematical
representation of the external coupling field.
Real fusion - not chaotic random kinetic events - *happens at rest *due
to magnetic resonance. The progress of LENR is outpacing everything you
believe to know and we now
Holmlid produces meson that contain strange quarks that yield energy
exceeding 500 MeV. Your scenario does not account for that level of energy
production,
"Relativistic charged particles with velocity up to 500 MeV u-1 thus 0.75
*c* are observed. Characteristic decay time constants for meson
We all know the fairy tales of good old standard model, created from
mathematicians stranded in physics like Dirac- that never did take basic
mechanics lessons.
All their fantasies are on the same level as the "endless story"
(M.Ende) something children like.
The Holmlid mechanism is simple
As per Keith Fredericks and others, the fact that the superconducting
particle is tachyonic is what makes the explanation so complicated. There
is only one tachyonic field so far discovered and that is the Higgs field.
Tachyonic condensation is a string theory subject.
Could it really be that simple?
From: Axil Axil
There is a formal analogy between the Higgs mechanism and superconductivity.
The historical record provides ample evidence that analogies between
superconductivity and particle physics played an important heuristic role in
the development of
27 matches
Mail list logo
