Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov in ICCF19

Jack Cole wrote: > I was interested to see that SKINR was unable to replicate Celani using > sensitive calorimetry. Quite a thorough paper. Sad to see. > > They wrote: "No excess heat was observed in a calorimeter of a sensitivity > <10 mW when running either the initial or

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov in ICCF19

I was interested to see that SKINR was unable to replicate Celani using sensitive calorimetry. Quite a thorough paper. Sad to see. They wrote: "No excess heat was observed in a calorimeter of a sensitivity <10 mW when running either the initial or later test protocols during ∼ 200 days of