Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov in ICCF19

2016-07-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jack Cole  wrote:


> I was interested to see that SKINR was unable to replicate Celani using
> sensitive calorimetry.  Quite a thorough paper.  Sad to see.
>
> They wrote: "No excess heat was observed in a calorimeter of a sensitivity
> <10 mW when running either the initial or later test protocols during ∼ 200
> days of testing."
>

Yeah. What a shame. I think between this paper and the work at MFMP
Celani's claim is pretty much proved wrong. You never know, but I do not
have much hope for it. I doubt that others will go to the trouble of trying
to replicate.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov in ICCF19

2016-07-07 Thread Jack Cole
I was interested to see that SKINR was unable to replicate Celani using
sensitive calorimetry.  Quite a thorough paper.  Sad to see.

They wrote: "No excess heat was observed in a calorimeter of a sensitivity
<10 mW when running either the initial or later test protocols during ∼ 200
days of testing."

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:27 PM Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Parkhomov, A. and E. Belousova, *Research into Heat Generators Similar to
> High-temperature Rossi Reactor.* J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2016.
> *19*.
>
> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedr.pdf#page=252
>