a constituent of a coherent system.
Bob Cook
frm: Brian Ahern<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 4:21 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM driv
0:41 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM drive
Jones—
I had the same idea about DH and QI together answering the galactic rotation
problem. The Mills spectrum of DH surely warrants
t is widely used today.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Russ
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2018 6:05 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark
> matter andexplains the EM drive
>
>
> McCulloch’s QI concept readily conforms
.
From: Russ
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 6:05 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM drive
McCulloch’s QI concept readily conforms to observed real cold fusion data and
is far superior to the armchair
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM drive
Jones—
I had the same idea about DH and QI together answering the galactic rotation
problem. The Mills spectrum of DH surely warrants a comparative review with
the
IMHO.
Bob Cook
From: JonesBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM drive
There is a new study from NASA on
There is a new study from NASA on dark matter/ dark energy and the
reinterpretation of the Chandra findings WRT the mystery radiation signature at
3.5 keV.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/news/a-new-twist-in-the-dark-matter-tale.html
CERN has a new report on DM as well. The informed
7 matches
Mail list logo