For various reasons I am convinced that there is something very
interesting going on with cavitation and the associated
sonoluminescence. However, I am not convinced that the Jamie Buturff
video sheds much light on this. Too much of it is what I call physics
word soup. Physics words that mean something, in combinations that
don't, or at least they don't without a lot more explanation and
supporting evidence.
The effect of electrostatic fields on living organisms is fascinating.
Many years ago I visited Mae-wan Ho in her lab where she showed that
static magnetic fields have strange effects on the growth of drosophila
larvae. The link between the DNA sequence and the morphology of an
organism is poorly understood and the electrostatic and magnetic
experiments give us hints which I still don't think we know how to
interpret. Interestingly, when I went to the youtube video one of the
suggested videos was by Rupert Sheldrake, who I also think may have
identified other useful hints. The idea that the organism(DNA) is able
to resonate with information from previous generations in a Sheldrake
like manner might explain how it somehow seems to pick up structures of
ancestral plants/animals in some circumstances. Its as if the field has
shifted the tuning/resonance so that the organism more closely resonates
with long dead ancestors. To be organism/variety specific any such
resonance would have to be a complex multifrequency sort of resonance,
and the results would suggest that there is a general trend for these to
shift in one direction over many generations, such that the
electrostatic field can shift them all back in a roughly synchronised
manner. There is a general tendency for repetitive DNA regions (which
I think are at the heart of this) to grow in length, which would be
consistent with a general lowering of resonant frequencies, so perhaps
the electrostatic field shifts them back up again.
This going back in time is also seen in plant breeding where there is a
tendency for plant varieties to revert back to their ancestral wild-type
forms in some conditions.
Nigel
On 16/12/2017 02:44, Harvey Norris wrote:
This morning seemed unusual in that it was like uncovering layers of
of onion which led me on a path of discovery which started from here;
Using electrostatic fields to manipulate plants and animals.
http://revolution-green.com/using-electrostatic-fields-manipulate-plants-animals/#comment-29441
This subject interests me in comparisons to my own examples too
numerous to mention here. This then led to the following Ebner effect
video; https://youtu.be/i69p0lldbGY
From there on the sidelines were other videos where I became
fascinated with many structured water videos. In the end I found the
following claim concerning sonoluminescence.
Blood Plasma, Sea Water, and Sonoluminescence
https://youtu.be/1owZDWRvYAQ
Flow induced cavitation is mentioned 4 min into video. At 5 1/2 min.
he claims that these cavitation bubbles he obtains would be altered if
he changed the flow pattern. Most remarkable claims I have not heard
of before, but I am purchasing his minimal porto flow unit. I think
that vortex list once mentioned Gary Paterson? that claimed over unity
from cavitation effects but I did not know that this also involved the
sono thing emiting light, which seems most bizaare. I welcome comments
and reply from vortex list since I dont recieve intial mailings for
some ungodly undecipherable reason but I might recieve replies. HDN
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
