Re: [Vo]:Vanishing tritium at BARC
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: That being consumed by a secondary reaction? That is Defkalion's position. They say there are several stages of reactions occurring.
Re: [Vo]:Vanishing tritium at BARC
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: Would anyone like to hazard a guess as to why the tritium goes away? That being consumed by a secondary reaction? Absorbed by something? I doubt it is leaking out. I like Terry's idea. The obvious thing to be ruled out is artefact due to variability in the cosmic ray background, which I assume they will have succeeded in doing. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Vanishing tritium at BARC
Isn't that also what Robert Godes hypothesizes Tritrium - Quadrium which is where the heat is produced? On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: Would anyone like to hazard a guess as to why the tritium goes away? That being consumed by a secondary reaction? Absorbed by something? I doubt it is leaking out. I like Terry's idea. The obvious thing to be ruled out is artefact due to variability in the cosmic ray background, which I assume they will have succeeded in doing. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Vanishing tritium at BARC
seems a possible direction. I remember also that some reports claim that heat and radiation (??? neutrons or gamm, don't remind) are exclusives... the multi-stage hypothesis seems credible. and if the neutrons produced where simply neutrons too fast to merge with hydrogenup... 2013/1/29 Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com Isn't that also what Robert Godes hypothesizes Tritrium - Quadrium which is where the heat is produced? On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: Would anyone like to hazard a guess as to why the tritium goes away? That being consumed by a secondary reaction? Absorbed by something? I doubt it is leaking out. I like Terry's idea. The obvious thing to be ruled out is artefact due to variability in the cosmic ray background, which I assume they will have succeeded in doing. Eric
