You are absolutely correct. I am not an experienced user and I will not
push this further ayway :-)
Sverre Haslund
2012/9/16 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
At 05:03 AM 9/15/2012, Sverre Haslund wrote:
Hmm.. my edit about SGS certificate has held for 10 minutes.Â
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
TheNextFuture, 5RR. I predict a block any day for TheNextFuture. This is
an SPA, likely the sock of a banned user. New users don't file AfDs in
their first few edits. . . .
All these arcane acronyms: SPA, AfD, blah, blah. As I said, Wikipedia
At 10:54 AM 9/16/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
TheNextFuture, 5RR. I predict a block any day for TheNextFuture.
This is an SPA, likely the sock of a banned user. New users don't
file AfDs in their first few edits. . . .
Hmm.. my edit about SGS certificate has held for 10 minutes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_plans
Sverre Haslund
2012/9/15 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
At 05:33 PM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 04:18 PM 9/14/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 05:03 AM 9/15/2012, Sverre Haslund wrote:
Hmm.. my edit about SGS certificate has held for
10
minutes.Â
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_planshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_plansÂ
Sverre Haslund
Eek.
Page history shows revert warring
Thanks for this answer! Very informative!
On a side note: The shutdownrossi.com site has been deleted. I of course
don't know why, perhaps it has been hacked... ;)
Wolf
Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Out of curiosity: Has there ever been a scam in
At 04:48 PM 9/13/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan J Fletcher mailto:a...@well.coma...@well.com wrote:
Thanks to AK for the correct link (which I'd already fixed on the
wiki -- though even my comments in talk have been collapsed -- and
I'm being threatened with arbitration.)
'Dat's how it
At 04:18 PM 9/14/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Well, very funny, Jed. However,
Mr. Fletcher is essentially clueless as to what would be acceptable as a
source for Wikipedia. I looked about and didn't see where he was
threatened with arbitration, which is weird. The last thing
that the cabal
At 03:33 PM 9/14/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I remember now why I gave up in December last year. But I thought it
was my turn to put in a shift or two at the coalface (or whatever).
I'm now getting my feet wet in Cold Fusion ... let's see how quick
THEY are. (Some of the players are the
Rossi also claimed CE certification a year ago. I found no such
certification under any of his or his wife's company names.
T
Andrea Rossi
September 13th, 2012 at 1:45 AM
Dear Giuseppe B.:
Mr Gary Wright ( a false name that the coward snake The Snake- is
using for cowardice, has contacted SGS in an unproper way and has put an
unproper question.
So he published on his newbogusenergybricolage that we do not have a
Is he saying that S. Krivit and Gary Wright are one and the same
individual?
From: Alan J Fletcher
.
Andrea Rossi
September
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=733cpage=1#comment-320805
13th, 2012 at 1:45 AM
Dear Giuseppe B.:
Mr Gary Wright ( a false name that the
On 2012-09-12 23:04, Harry Veeder wrote:
This blog called Shut down Rossi can't find any evidence that safety
certificate was issue by SGS as Rossi claims.
Here's the safety certificate by SGS:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/105839897/EFA-rep-1107
Source:
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
This blog called Shut down Rossi can't find any evidence that safety
certificate was issue by SGS as Rossi claims.
Here's the safety certificate by SGS:
I'll be darned! How do you like that?!
As I have often said, Rossi says all kinds of
At 12:55 PM 9/13/2012, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2012-09-12 23:04, Harry Veeder wrote:
This blog called Shut down Rossi can't find any evidence that safety
certificate was issue by SGS as Rossi claims.
Here's the safety certificate by SGS:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/105839897/EFA-rep-1107
On 2012-09-13 22:09, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I'll be darned! How do you like that?!
[...]
Hmm... hold on!
Read this on the bottom of page 2:
This certificate relates solely to the above identified prototype
machine within the limits of the request for voluntary testing of
essential health and
At 01:19 PM 9/13/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I gleefully added it to the wiki (and deletion discussion) !!!
Of course it's been deleted already as a primary source with zero relevance
Now for the questions -- the certificate states 200kW IN, 1MW out --
does the certification confirm those numbers?
At 01:42 PM 9/13/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Now for the questions -- the certificate states 200kW IN, 1MW out --
does the certification confirm those numbers?
The directive is at
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoclg=ENnumdoc=32006L0032
but it
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote . . . or translated, I
guess, the small print:
This certificate relates solely to the above identified prototype machine
within the limits of the request for voluntary testing of essential health
and safety requirements relevant to Annex I of
Still - didn't SGS have to test this prototype in some way to find out
if it runs within their safety parameters? How did they run these tests?
Wolf
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
mailto:shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote . . . or translated, I
guess, the small print:
This
At 02:03 PM 9/13/2012, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Still - didn't SGS have to test this prototype in some way to find
out if it runs within their safety parameters? How did they run these tests?
Here's a clear copy as a PDF file : (I'd only seen the jpg)
On 2012-09-13 23:03, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Still - didn't SGS have to test this prototype in some way to find out
if it runs within their safety parameters? How did they run these tests?
Try checking if you can find that out in the following link. This is the
EC directive under which the 1MW
Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Still - didn't SGS have to test this prototype in some way to find out if
it runs within their safety parameters? How did they run these tests?
I think you are right.
I was poking fun at this, but Rossi is quite right to say that his reactor
has been
Thanks to AK for the correct link (which I'd already fixed on the
wiki -- though even my comments in talk have been collapsed -- and
I'm being threatened with arbitration.)
Article 5 and Annex I indicate that this is at least a pre-requisite
for commercial sale, and that other regulations may
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Thanks to AK for the correct link (which I'd already fixed on the wiki --
though even my comments in talk have been collapsed -- and I'm being
threatened with arbitration.)
'Dat's how it woiks at Wikipedia. First 'dey collapse you. 'Den they
arbitrate you.
Can someone confirm the power output? The certificate says:
Power In: 200 kw (max)
Power Out: 1MW
Water flow rate: 1500 kg/h
Temperature in: 85C
Temperature out: 120C
Craig
At 02:58 PM 9/13/2012, Craig Haynie wrote:
Can someone confirm the power output? The certificate says:
Power In: 200 kw (max) Power Out: 1MW
Water flow rate: 1500 kg/hr Temperature in: 85C Temperature out: 120C
As AK pointed out, this particular certificate doesn't certify the
Out of curiosity: Has there ever been a scam in which a safety
certificate from a big and independent organization has been granted?
Wolf
At 02:58 PM 9/13/2012, Craig Haynie wrote:
Can someone confirm the power output? The certificate says:
Power In: 200 kw (max) Power Out: 1MW
Water flow
Wolf Fischer wolffisc...@gmx.de wrote:
Out of curiosity: Has there ever been a scam in which a safety certificate
from a big and independent organization has been granted?
Interesting question.
I do not know much about scams. I do not have a comprehensive database of
them. Perhaps such a
Andrea Rossi
September 13th, 2012 at 3:54 PM
Dear Brian:
The reports are under NDA.
Also the testing done is under NDA
The SGS engineers have worked for the safety certification, not for the
product certifications, therefore they did not work on the COP issue.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think so, because newbogusenergybricolage sounds like an allusion
to Kirvit's newenergytimes.com.
harry
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Is he saying that S. Krivit and “Gary Wright” are one and the same
individual?
From: Alan J Fletcher
.
From Harry:
This blog called Shut down Rossi can't find any evidence that safety
certificate was issue by SGS as Rossi claims.
http://shutdownrossi.com/?page_id=1774
this is hilarious.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised. How many wannabe rossi related
websites are there now?
Regards
Steven
Harry Veeder wrote:
This blog called Shut down Rossi can't find any evidence that safety
certificate was issue by SGS as Rossi claims.
This person has it in for Rossi, doesn't he?
Rossi rubs people the wrong way.
Why worry about Rossi? Who has he hurt, other than himself? If he is all
that
On 2012-09-12 23:04, Harry Veeder wrote:
I suppose it is possible that the certificate was issued under a
different company name because SGS only confirms that a certificate
was not issued to any of the companies listed by the owner of Shut
down Rossi
I would say it's highly probable that the
35 matches
Mail list logo
