Re: CMNS: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries

2018-01-30 Thread mixent
by a mass spec. at all. > >Good point! Thanks for the clarification of my mis-calculation. > > >From: mix...@bigpond.com <mix...@bigpond.com> >Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 2:58 PM >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: Re: CMNS: R

Re: CMNS: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries

2018-01-30 Thread Brian Ahern
Good point! Thanks for the clarification of my mis-calculation. From: mix...@bigpond.com <mix...@bigpond.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 2:58 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CMNS: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries In

Re: CMNS: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries

2018-01-30 Thread mixent
In reply to Brian Ahern's message of Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:24:09 +: Hi, [snip] >I did not mean to discredit Mel's work. I am sure it was well done, but it is >difficult to measure 100mWatts of excess energy when Gerald Pollack says that >amount of energy can simply be stored in the water from

Re: CMNS: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries

2018-01-30 Thread Brian Ahern
To: m...@theworld.com Cc: ahern_br...@msn.com Subject: Re: CMNS: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries Mitchell, Thank-you for defending my C/F work against the false allegations by Brian Ahern. I would like to add the following: 1. Radiation was measured in the 1990 experiments s