Peter Amstutz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 07:23:05AM -0500, Reed Hedges wrote:
How is this different than the way things currently are?
It's not, except that s5 uses 32 bit identifiers as the canonical name
of a vobject rather than arbitrary strings.
Are you proposing to require that
Am 11.12.2006 um 19:03 schrieb Peter Amstutz:
I'm thinking that it would be useful to have a well defined root,
similar to the unix file system root, and for vobjects on the site
to be
treated sort of like inodes. This has a few advantages: it is simpler
to mount conventional filesystems
How is this different than the way things currently are?
Are you proposing to require that all objects except one special root
have at least one parent? Or just to encourage that practice for most
objects?
Reed
Peter Amstutz wrote:
I just wanted to float another idea for a change in s4 to
I just wanted to float another idea for a change in s4 to s5.
Previously in s4, there was no well defined root of the vobject tree.
Or rather, there was the site root, but listing the contents of this
root would get you every vobject on the site, which was rarely what you
wanted.
I'm
