On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:32:11PM +0200, Hugh Perkins wrote:
What Peter said. I think. It's been a while :-)
Random aside: I've been playing with .Net at work; it's kindof cool, though
it's basically VB with a C++ syntactic sugar. I dunno why people claim that
C# means the end of VB,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At work we have a large application that incorporates Managed and
Unmanaged C++, C# and several COM objects. .Net/CLR does a pretty good
job of tying it all together without too much fuss (except for the COM
objects, which are ugly and we're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Reed Hedges wrote:
Am I correct that it's no problem to call C++ code or link against a C++
library from .net? Would the C++ library (libvos for example :) need to
be compiled with CLR (.net extensions) enabled?
Reed
See
