Re: [vos-d] [browser] UI ideas

[Jonathan Jones]

That's an important distinction. Is the chat code going to be integral
to the VOS protocol, or is it going to be relegated to the role of a
standard plugin?

Lalo Martins wrote:

 I was talking to Peter on IRC about UI flexibility - how to allow
 the browser to adapt itself for games and whatnot - and defending
 the idea that client-side code (as in code downloaded from the
 site) is a can of worms that doesn't need to be opened yet.





___
vos-d mailing list
vos-d@interreality.org
http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d

[vos-d] Re: [aims]

[Lalo Martins]

And so says Jonathan Jones on 11/12/05 02:37...
 Just out of interest, forget sourceforge, forget the website, in your
 minds, what do you aim to acheive with this project?

I believe Peter has stated he wants to do the web, but he can speak for
himself.

Me, I want the 3dui - the everyday UI you use to do stuff.  This is at
the same time more and less interesting, because there are already a few
functional 3duis.  (Or vrui or ii or whatever you prefer to call
it.)  I think they're not going anywhere because there is a lack of
pull, a lack of basically two things - enough apps that you can actually
use this in production, and a few killer apps that make people come and
try.  I think the killer apps is what we're working on - we have pretty
much the vr equivalent of IRC, and Peter dreams of the 3d web, and a few
of us are working on games which would be very flexible thanks to the
vos model.

best,
   Lalo Martins
--
  So many of our dreams at first seem impossible,
   then they seem improbable, and then, when we
   summon the will, they soon become inevitable.
--
http://www.laranja.org/  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNU: never give up freedom http://www.gnu.org/


___
vos-d mailing list
vos-d@interreality.org
http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d