Re: [vos-d] Van Jacobson: named data

2007-05-09 Thread Len Bullard
You put your finger on the major issue: cost. The energy budget is a part of the noise factor of any communications network, artificial or organized. The web is predated by better designs with regards to noise and is a bit of a botch with respect to quality in terms of how it has been marketed.

Re: [vos-d] Van Jacobson: named data -- revision control

2007-05-09 Thread Ken Taylor
Lalo Martins wrote: On Wed, 09 May 2007 09:07:57 +0200, Karsten Otto wrote: I don't quite understand what you need versioning for. The bulk of changes you get in a shared word is avatar movement, which may wind up to ~30 changes per second per avatar. Do you really want to keep a record

Re: [vos-d] delineation and revision control

2007-05-09 Thread Peter Amstutz
Let's see if I can clear up a few things... Bear in mind that the design is still evolving in my head :-) a) From the perspective of VOS, which is concerned with synchronization, the most important purpose of versioning is so you have a basis for deciding whether your replica A' of vobject A

Re: [vos-d] Van Jacobson: named data -- revision control

2007-05-09 Thread Peter Amstutz
I don't think Jacobson was suggesting that a really new paradigm in networking would be able to handle the robust case of broadcast data, of which unicasting is simply a subset. I find you need a little creativity to fill in some of the gaps in the later part of the talk, since he wasn't