Hi Alexander,
In the very first e-mail, you have shown us the plot of table_.xvg, I
suppose this is the forces column. Now you can see that the force is 0
before and after the region of interest.
In fact, it does not matter how big K you put in topol.top for bond type 8,
K*0 = 0. I think that's
Dear Gustavo,
(...)
> Your reply made me realize that problem with the tab characters. Maybe
> the XML
> parser is getting confused with a mix of tabs and white spaces?
>
> In any case, now it works correctly (as long as only spaces are used). and
> I
> see the proper exclusions when I run
Dear Gustav,
W dniu czwartek, 27 października 2016 15:16:58 UTC+2 użytkownik Gustavo
Rondina napisał:
>
> Hello VOTCA folks,
>
> Since LAMMPS dump files provide no topological information, I'm doing as
> instructed in the manual and using a XML topology. However, I'm not quite
> sure how to
2016-07-14 3:52 GMT+02:00 Sikandar Mashayak :
> Hi,
>
> I am testing a case in which I want to compute water-water RDF from the
> lammps trajectory.
>
> So, I need to provide xml topology, xml mapping, base *.dump, and
> trajectory dump files. However, it is not clear how to
Hi,
AFAIR there was a bug in version < 1.3 which cause that only first molecule
type was used to generate exclusion lists. If HPC administrator could not
upgrade VOTCA the you have to install your own local copy (which is a
pretty straightforward procedure).
Best,
Jakub
On 7 December 2015 at
t http://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
#!/usr/bin/env python
"""
Copyright (C) 2015 Jakub Krajniak <jkrajn...@gmail.com>
This file is distributed under free software licence:
you can redistribute it and/or modify it
Dear all,
I have noticed that the latest development version (91580e26a728) behaviour
in different
way than the previous development version (52acb2010494).
Mainly I have single 3 beads molecule (hexane) A1-B1-A2 with bonds A1-B1,
A2-B2 and angle A1-B1-A2;
I expected that csg_stat will not
On 27 April 2015 at 16:57, Christoph Junghans jungh...@votca.org wrote:
2015-04-27 4:10 GMT-06:00 Jakub Krajniak jkrajn...@gmail.com:
Dear all,
I have noticed that the latest development version (91580e26a728)
behaviour
in different
way than the previous development version
Hi,
Am I right that calculating thermoforce can only be done with GROMACS
engine?
I tried to simply say programespressopp/program but immediately I get
an error
with statement of missing grompp.mdp file. Are there some significant
reason to not use
other md engine (like Espresso++) ?
Best,
Dear,
I tried to find it in documentation but without success. So I thought about
to run
some command at the begging of the step and at the end of it. That could be
any
bash/python/software piece of code.
Is it possible with the current state of the code?
Best, Jakub
--
You received this
in
that case?
Best,
Jakub Krajniak
--
Jakub Krajniak, Computer Science Department @ KU Leuven
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
votca group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to votca+unsubscr
that. Is it possible
that
it is because of bond interaction? I have defined the exclusion list for
.top so
this should be handled and the behavior does not changed.
Best regards,
Jakub Krajniak
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
votca group.
To unsubscribe from
(...)
And the convergence, I have add post_addconvergence/post_add so that
I
can measure the convergence.
4. What should be the optimal case for the convergence?
What I am getting: (step_001: ~300, step_002: ~232, step_003: ~133) and
then
suddenly for step_004 it is ~8000.
On Sunday, 26 January 2014 21:02:58 UTC+1, Christoph Junghans wrote:
2014-01-26 Jakub Krajniak jkra...@gmail.com javascript::
(...)
And the convergence, I have add post_addconvergence/post_add so
that
I
can measure the convergence.
4. What should be the optimal case
On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 17:24:36 UTC+1, Christoph Junghans wrote:
2014/1/21 Jakub Krajniak jkra...@gmail.com javascript::
Hi all,
I am playing with Votca from a couple of weeks to get the effective
potential of quite simple polymer system.
Mainly I have very short (4 beads
Forgot to mention. I'd like to get the potential for non-bonded interaction
by using the iterative Boltzmann method.
Best, Jakub
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
votca group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
,
Jakub Krajniak
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
votca group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to votca+un...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
To post to this group, send email to vo
.
Best,
Jakub Krajniak
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
votca group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to votca+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to votca@googlegroups.com.
Visit
18 matches
Mail list logo