Dear Christoph,
After several trials with the suggestions from you and Vitalie, I still 
cannot obtain the nonbonded interactions.
So I switch to the explicit solvent model, then I get the converged 
interactions, although I don't want to use the explicit model, but it seems 
to be the only way I can do currently.
Thank you and Vitalie for all the help!
Best regards,
Zidan

On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 19:13:49 UTC+2, Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> 2016-09-20 2:11 GMT-06:00 Zidan Zhang <zhang...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: 
> > Dear Christoph, 
> > Thank you so much for your advices. 
> > - I have increased the cutoff to 3.0 nm, this time all the rdfs go 
> steadily 
> > to 1, but no obvious improvement can be observed within 52 steps, the 
> plots 
> > in the attachment have the lowest convergence (at 41 step); 
> > - the current system contains 100 decamers (each chain contains 10 
> > structural units), the box length is 10 nm, and with 6500 solvent 
> molecules 
> > (not water, 2-Butanone), 40 ns NVT simulation, is it big enough? all 
> types 
> > of distributions look smoothly. 
> If the *target* rdf haven't change for a bigger system, you are fine. 
>
> Christoph 
> > 
> > I will try the rest options. 
> > 
> > Thank you again! 
> > Best regards, 
> > Zidan 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Monday, 19 September 2016 18:15:06 UTC+2, Christoph Junghans wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Some of the rdfs go very abruptly to 1, so you might want to try: 
> >> - increasing the cutoff 
> >> - using a bigger system 
> >> - doing a PBC correction as in http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4742067 
> >> 
> >> Another option is to 
> >> - add extra exclusion 
> >> - use a fudge factor for the 1-4 interactions 
> >> - adding a couple of special 1-4 interactions 
> >> for that I would split the rdfs in inter-molecular and intra-molecular 
> >> pairs and check if the parts agree to the atomistic case separately. 
> >> 
> >> Christoph 
> >> 
> >> 2016-09-18 3:10 GMT-06:00 Zidan Zhang <zhang...@gmail.com>: 
> >> > The possible reason of mistaken the exclusions can be ignored, I have 
> >> > already checked! 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > On Sunday, 18 September 2016 11:07:09 UTC+2, Zidan Zhang wrote: 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Dear All, 
> >> >> As shown in enclosed material, I prepared a monomer system and a 
> >> >> coresponding decamer system. For the coarse-grained level, I made 
> the 
> >> >> solvent implicit, and using three-beads mapping scheme for each 
> >> >> structural 
> >> >> unit. The IBI for monomer system and for bonded interactions of 
> decamer 
> >> >> system works well, but for the nonbonded interactions of decamer, 
> all 
> >> >> interactions have deviations from their atomistic targets. 
> >> >> I have tried: 
> >> >> 1. using different initial CG configuration; 
> >> >> 2. change the temperature to modify the initial guess of the 
> potential; 
> >> >> 3. scale factor during the iteration; 
> >> >> 4. a five-beads mapping scheme. 
> >> >> All of these couldn't solve the problem, for some cases listed 
> above, 
> >> >> the 
> >> >> decamers in the box get phase separation. 
> >> >> Any suggestions? Thank you very much! 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Best regards, 
> >> >> Zidan 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> > -- 
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups 
> >> > "votca" group. 
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> send 
> >> > an 
> >> > email to votca+un...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > To post to this group, send email to vo...@googlegroups.com. 
> >> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca. 
> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Christoph Junghans 
> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "votca" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to votca+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to vo...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>. 
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christoph Junghans 
> Web: http://www.compphys.de 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to votca+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to votca@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to