can someone give me a more useful description of the problem here? who
is blocking whom? it sounds like my MTA rejected sending email to
netease, but ORDB and tcp wrappers for exim (which i use) should block
incoming mail from spammers, not outgoing mail to spammers.
at least, i'm pretty sure
The reciever is setup to use a block list by ip address. So, lookup your MX
and/or IP Address in a lookup site.
For all potential email block/spam problems, I turn to
www.dnsstuff.com
The MX for dirac.org is 'mail.dirac.org'
The IP is 64.164.47.8'
Looking up the IP Address at DNSStuff gets
---ORIGINAL MESSAGE---
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 08:50:33 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Peter Jay Salzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vox-tech] smtp question - blocked ip
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can someone give me a more useful description of the problem here?
[SNIP]
-
They blacklisted Pac Bell? Now there's a nice example of
spitting into the wind. :-)
-- Rod
http://www.sunsetsystems.com/
On Friday 03 January 2003 09:15 am, Steven Peck wrote:
The reciever is setup to use a block list by ip address. So, lookup your
MX and/or IP Address in a lookup
Yes well, it's enough to prevent Pete from emailing out. I like
DNSStuff.com, it's a great resource.
Spamhaus blocked Pacbell DSL ip addresses. Evidently they felt that PacBell
has been ignoring there complaints regarding a few persistent spammers. If I
thought I could get away with it here at
Hm, my messages seem to be coming through all right...
At 09:49 AM 1/3/2003, you wrote:
Yes well, it's enough to prevent Pete from emailing out. I like
DNSStuff.com, it's a great resource.
Spamhaus blocked Pacbell DSL ip addresses. Evidently they felt that PacBell
has been ignoring there
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 09:49:24AM -0800, Steven Peck wrote:
will prbably see a dramatic increase. The sad part is, a lot of it is to non
existant email addresses. SO not only is the spammer irratating me, he is
ripping off his customer.
So install a bounce handler that rejects originating
ummm...email at work is MS Exchange and that works well enough protected by
an SMTP relay on the DMZ.
Existing Enterprise smtp relay entry point is also a Win32 solution that is a
cheap (cheap as in piece of crap) inflexible one at that. A Linux solution
using Postfix or Sendmail has been
sorry, not spamhaus, spamblock.
-Original Message-
From: Richard S. Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vox-tech] smtp question - blocked ip
Hm, my messages seem to be coming through all right...
At 09:49 AM
oh well,
I thought that there might be something to the red-carpet
rpm database vs the up2date rpm database.
-- Andy
--- Richard Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do indeed have Red Carpet on my system.
I'm poking around Ximian's knowledge base now. I have a
feeling it
might have
Sorry to re-note this, but did you try the suggestion made by iCharles
Polisher/i (One of the things I mentioned was a possible file system
problem with files, permissions, etc. A problem with these files could be
it. If this suggestion clobbers the old db files which will be created
again anyway,
I did try it. No luck. *grumble*
At 11:24 AM 1/3/2003, you wrote:
Sorry to re-note this, but did you try the suggestion made by iCharles
Polisher/i (One of the things I mentioned was a possible file system
problem with files, permissions, etc. A problem with these files could be
it. If this
(Sorry, trying to get caught up on e-mail again)
Richard Crawford said:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 11:58, ME wrote:
Fail after a pwrite? Hmm. Would you mind running this again, but instead
try:
# strace -f rpm --rebuilddb
? The -f also does the strace on child processes spawned by the first. I
Some more odd questions:
Are all of your filesystems mounts (rw)?
(just run mount to see)
Before the next time you run
# rpm --rebuilddb
Could you check the man page for it? Is there a way to increase the level
of verbosity? Sometimes, apps will allow for a number like
-d 100 to set debug level
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 11:56, ME wrote:
Some more odd questions:
Are all of your filesystems mounts (rw)?
(just run mount to see)
Ayuh. Every single one.
Before the next time you run
# rpm --rebuilddb
Could you check the man page for it? Is there a way to increase the level
of
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 11:34, ME wrote:
Since it is immediate, and we see no other items in the trace, I would
expect it is not a path issue with symlinks. It is sounding more and more
like a file problem. Like there is an attempt to open a file (earlier)
that is assumed to allready be open
Richard Crawford said:
rpm does indeed have a verbose option. Here ya go:
===
[root@mossroot rscrawford]# rpm --rebuilddb -vv
D: rebuilding database /var/lib/rpm into /var/lib/rpmrebuilddb.1697
D: creating
I don't believe you've said what version of RedHat you're running.
Also, specifically, what version of rpm are you running?
rpm -q rpm would suffice.
Assuming it's RedHat 7.x, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73198
Also see:
http://www.rpm.org/hintskinks/repairdb/
___
vox-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
lots of good tidbits and info there.
On Friday 03 January 2003 09:35 pm, Charles Polisher wrote:
Also see:
http://www.rpm.org/hintskinks/repairdb/
___
vox-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.lugod.org/mailman/listinfo/vox-tech
20 matches
Mail list logo
