In a message of 15-Aug-01 ORHUN KABAKLI wrote:
I think Vapor is doing MorphOS fanatism..
I don't know why Vapor (at least some programmers) does this:
Because they think acting like this makes them cool?
Because it makes their software better?
At least it makes their software
...
I think Vapor is doing MorphOS fanatism..
I don't know why Vapor (at least some programmers) does this:
Because MorphOS is cool and have future. What else MODERN
you can run on the CRAZY expensive HW, you owning now?
Look, for DVD and DivX playing, i created myself a pC. A 900MHz
In a message of 15-Aug-01 Trodas wrote:
Faster that IBrowse on 060/p96 PIV gfx?
We can then only hope for this! Hray!
Yes, I believe that the MorphOS version of Voyager is faster than
any 68k browser for the Amiga. I admit that I don't know. I haven't got
a PPC myself and I haven't
Hello ORHUN
On 15-Aug-01, you wrote:
I think Vapor is doing MorphOS fanatism..
I don't know why Vapor (at least some programmers) does this:
Because they think acting like this makes them cool?
Because it makes their software better?
Because MorphOS is available and running on Amiga
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:23:31 +0300, ORHUN KABAKLI wrote:
I think Vapor is doing MorphOS fanatism..
Fanatism is definitely not the right word. Something like support
and interest would be correct.
I don't know why Vapor (at least some programmers) does this:
Because they think acting like
hi,
BTW, we still support 68k builds and it's not going to end tomorrow. I even
spend time making sure the 68k build is ok and improving it for specific
things (eg. 64-bit computation support for SAS/C). It's not fanatism, it's
common sense.
what compiler is used for the MorphOS version?
--- Reply to a message ---
By: Alan Buxey
-: a Mail
:: [voyager] Re: Fanatism
BTW, we still support 68k builds and it's not going to end tomorrow. I
even spend time making sure the 68k build is ok and improving it for
specific things (eg. 64-bit computation support for SAS/C). It's
