[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-07 Thread Julian Aronowitz
Hello All, On Fri, May 5, 2001, at 02:18 PM, Ian wrote: Ken Shillito wrote: by twiddling with the code. The whole architecture of the OS is far slicker than many others. And yes, before 100 people point it out, The resons the Amiga`s OS is so efficient include: 1. Amiga's

[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-07 Thread Matt Sealey
Hello Julian On 07-May-01, you wrote: I shall state something very heretical, Do you think it might be the right time to consider officially involving the people who have worked on AWeb and IBrowse, as well as those working on Voyager, for the purpose of establishing a workable JAVA

[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-05 Thread Ian Greenway
Ken Shillito wrote: by twiddling with the code. The whole architecture of the OS is far slicker than many others. And yes, before 100 people point it out, The resons the Amiga`s OS is so efficient include: 1. Amiga's messages between tasks send pointers to the memory of the [...] 2.

[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-04 Thread Ken Shillito
From: Ian Greenway [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lars Svoldgaard wrote: Amiga is so efficient because it's so slow. There's not a lot of horsepower available, so the programmers have to optimize the software to make it run at an acceptable speed. An amiga just isn't fast enough to run Java at

[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-02 Thread Julian Aronowitz
Hello, On Tue, May 1, 2001, at 02:54 PM, you wrote: From: Don Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED], Apr 30 On 29-Apr-01, Ken Shillito wrote: What the above does show, is the urgency of getting CSS going on the Amiga - many of the tags which we must use for style are already deprecated,

[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-02 Thread Lars Svoldgaard
On 2. maj 2001, Julian Aronowitz wrote: As for JAVA, I don't think the problem is so serious. So far as I can see, the proportion of pages using Java is not increasing. I suspect that Java would run too slowly on 68K Amigas. No one has said why JAVA would run too slowly on 68K type

[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-02 Thread David Gerber
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 03:16:39AM -0400, Julian Aronowitz wrote: Good point, except, I do not run *any* background programs like DOpus or Enforcer or SnoopDOS, and I have usually had V get stuck. Why is that? In fact, until someone can show me how to prevent V from being such a memory

[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-02 Thread Jools Smyth
Hello Lars On 02-May-01, Lars Svoldgaard wrote: Amiga is so efficient because it's so slow. There's not a lot of horsepower available, so the programmers have to optimize the software to make it run at an acceptable speed. An amiga just isn't fast enough to run Java at an acceptable pace,

[voyager] Re: Support for deprecated tags

2001-05-02 Thread Ian Greenway
Lars Svoldgaard wrote: Amiga is so efficient because it's so slow. There's not a lot of horsepower available, so the programmers have to optimize the software to make it run at an acceptable speed. An amiga just isn't fast enough to run Java at an acceptable pace, plus not many users have