hi,
He can use the arrow keys to scroll. I can't.
He can block/cut text from URL's. I can't.
We both have 3.3.120
..he is using an AmigaOS commodity that your arent?
alan
_
Voyager Mailing List -
In a message of 06-Jan-02 Franco Coccini wrote:
PS- onestly, Olli, this beta is unusable, even for testing purpose .-
Nobody forces you to use it, do they?
It seems to work okay here.
Uffe Holst
_
Voyager Mailing
Hello Franco
On 06-Jan-02, you wrote:
Ciao Wagner,
but:
why you don't grant a realase of V, WITHOUT debug code and with 68k
optimization enabled?
The debug code isn't in the beta releases, we disable the menu. If there
is no menu there to enable the debug options, it has relatively
Rob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb
Got time for an old-timer (14.4kbps is fast!) question?
I just downloaded the demo version of Voyager 3.2 (16.4.2000)
and it seems very slow. Alynx loads my class homework page
(www.interchange.ubc.ca/morewood) in 9 seconds (just over 20
seconds
On 14-Oct-01, Oliver Wagner wrote:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Don Cox wrote:
It took 3 seconds to download and lay out here on a 68060, using a
cable modem, so there is obviously something wrong. On your
processor, it
He's using Voyager 3.2 -- I wasn't lying when I bragged over the huge
Hello Oliver
On 14-Oct-01, Oliver Wagner wrote:
=
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Don Cox wrote:
=
It took 3 seconds to download and lay out here on a 68060, using a
cable modem, so there is obviously something wrong. On your
processor, it
=
He's using Voyager 3.2 -- I wasn't lying when I
I'm sick of watching web pages come in bit by bit, showing all the works
and empty squares for images and mess. It looks totally unprofessional.
As long as the text comes up FAST!, I don't care too much about the
"holes" where the images will go, when they get decoded.
That's my major
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000 16:10:01 +, Don Cox wrote:
IMHO the rendering of a page before its contents have been completely
read is an important feature of web browsers which should stay that
way.
You could have it that way if you want. I'm suggesting that this should
be optional. As
- Original Message -
From: "Don Cox" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 10:10 AM
Subject: [voyager] Re: Why?
On 24-Dec-00, Ingo Heinicke wrote:
IMHO the rendering of a page before its contents have been completely
read is an importa
Original Message -
From: "Julian Aronowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now, why do you see all that stuff first, anyway? Your (every-
one's) graphical Web browser (MS IE, Netscape Nav/Comm, Voyager,
AWeb, IBrowse, Opera) is, in part a type of text reader. Thus,
whatever is first handed
Hello Don
On 24-Dec-00, you wrote:
I'm sick of watching web pages come in bit by bit, showing all the works
and empty squares for images and mess. It looks totally unprofessional.
How can a webbrowser be unprofessional?
If you go for a meal in a restaurant, you don't want to watch the
On 23-Dec-00, Bob Quintal wrote:
Why don't we just get a progress bar as the page is loaded and laid
out, and then a clean wipe (like a Scala wipe) to the new page? Or if
a progress bar is impossible, just the messages we see now at the
bottom.
I wouldn't want that for several reasons,
Hello Matt
On 24-Dec-00, Matt Sealey wrote:
Hello Don
On 24-Dec-00, you wrote:
I'm sick of watching web pages come in bit by bit, showing all the
works and empty squares for images and mess. It looks totally
unprofessional.
How can a webbrowser be unprofessional?
I think showing
On 24-Dec-00, David Scheibler wrote:
Why don't [...]
you download the current alpha snapshot? :)
I just did. It's impressive. It seems to be as fast as IE on a machine
with a 4x faster CPU, maybe even faster.
And most pages lay out well. The obvious exception is
lordoftherings.net, which
I'm sick of watching web pages come in bit by bit, showing all the
works and empty squares for images and mess. It looks totally
unprofessional. [...]
I think showing the "works" rather than the result that the user wants
is always unprofessional.
There are several things you can do to get
On 24-Dec-00, Ingo Heinicke wrote:
IMHO the rendering of a page before its contents have been completely
read is an important feature of web browsers which should stay that
way.
You could have it that way if you want. I'm suggesting that this should
be optional. As downloads get faster
Hi All,
On Sun, Dec 24, 2000, at 11:13 AM, you wrote:
Hello Matt
On 24-Dec-00, Matt Sealey wrote:
Hello Don
On 24-Dec-00, you wrote:
I'm sick of watching web pages come in bit by bit, showing all the
works and empty squares for images and mess. It looks totally
On 23-Dec-00, Don Cox wrote:
I'm sick of watching web pages come in bit by bit, showing all the
works and empty squares for images and mess. It looks totally
unprofessional.
If you go for a meal in a restaurant, you don't want to watch the pig
being slaughtered.
Why don't we just
Alexander Birrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some people may have more than just an Amiga in their household, maybe
your daughter, son, father etc so isn't it better everybody knows about
these rather than sticking your head in the sand and saying "NA NA NA
doesn't affect me" one day it
Sealey, M. wrote in a Mail about "[voyager] Re: why I never send or open
exe.files (fwd)":
This is not a virus mailing list for PCs. How come on every Amiga
mailing list I'm on, people insist on posting virus alerts for
PCs?
Surely it would be better posted to - shock horror! - a
Why did i got two keyfiles ?
I have registered V3 and got a Email with the V3 keyfile.
Ok so far
And then got another Email with a second keyfile for V.
But it seems so far i have understand it that this key is for V2.95.
Correct, correct.
When you order V3, you also get a VNG key free
Hi Chris Wiles. On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 09:22:36 +0100 you wrote:
When you order V3, you also get a VNG key free as well, registered to
yourself. Why? As V3 is still a beta pre-release (unlike the 'final' IB 2.1,
of course :P), so some people still prefer VNG for certain tasks.
Will there be a
[ Chris Wiles wrote: ]
Correct, correct.
When you order V3, you also get a VNG key free as well, registered to
yourself. Why? As V3 is still a beta pre-release (unlike the 'final'
IB 2.1, of course :P), so some people still prefer VNG for certain
tasks.
Is there a special price upgrade
When you order V3, you also get a VNG key free as well, registered to
yourself. Why? As V3 is still a beta pre-release (unlike the 'final' IB 2.1,
of course :P), so some people still prefer VNG for certain tasks.
Will there be a 2.95 - 3.0 upgrade path?
Rolf
Chris already
Hello, Chris
Le 06-Sep-99, Chris Wiles a écrit:
Why did i got two keyfiles ?
I have registered V3 and got a Email with the V3 keyfile.
Ok so far
And then got another Email with a second keyfile for V.
But it seems so far i have understand it that this key is for V2.95.
25 matches
Mail list logo
