On 20/11/03, Matt Sealey wrote:
Unfortunately for 68k users, until a 600MHz 68080 appears, some of the
functionality of modern browsers is going to be far beyond your reach
anyway, the same way that Aweb has split now into APL and KHTML
versions to accomodate both, Voyager may do the same.
On 20/11/03, Julian Aronowitz wrote:
What we do expect from the developers of such
things as Voyager and AWeb is to correct some of the
inabilities or finish some of the upgrades to allow
those programs to continue to be able to access
sites. We do not expect to be able to swallow huge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Don Cox
Sent: 26 November 2003 14:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
On 20/11/03, Matt Sealey wrote:
Unfortunately for 68k users, until a 600MHz 68080 appears, some of the
On 26/11/03, Matt Sealey wrote:
Unfortunately for 68k users, until a 600MHz 68080 appears, some of
the functionality of modern browsers is going to be far beyond your
reach anyway, the same way that Aweb has split now into APL and
KHTML versions to accomodate both, Voyager may do the same.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Don Cox
Sent: 26 November 2003 16:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
I think you misunderstood.
Your original post suggests that the problem is the slow speed of the
CPU.
In a message of 26-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Your original post suggests that the problem is the slow speed of the
CPU. This certainly makes Flash almost useless on a real Amiga. It is
not a problem on Amithlon.
I have replied personally to keep this off the list.
Why? I find that your
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Uffe Holst
Sent: 26 November 2003 20:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: What?
In a message of 26-Nov-03 Matt Sealey wrote:
Your original post suggests that the problem is the
