[vpp-dev] how to apply a dpdk makefile patch?

2018-05-01 Thread Zhiyong Yang
Hi, folks, I try to apply a dpdk makefile patch to add an option to dpdk shared lib, how can I enable it in VPP ? Thanks Zhiyong

Re: [vpp-dev] Figure out u16 mapping in NAT API output

2018-05-01 Thread Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco)
There is bug, fields are decoded wrong way in vl_api_nat44_user_session_details_t_handler (nat_test.c) Just note, nat44_user_session_dump works only with non-deterministic NAT. Matus From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Hamid via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Wednesday, May 2,

Re: [vpp-dev] Figure out u16 mapping in NAT API output

2018-05-01 Thread Hamid via Lists.Fd.Io
Cannot find a decoder for these fields so I think these incomprehensible value for port numbers and protocol number should be reported as a bug?

[vpp-dev] FW: [openstack-dev] networking-vpp 18.04 for VPP 18.04 is now available

2018-05-01 Thread Jerome Tollet
People on this list may be interested by this message. Jerome De : Naveen Joy Répondre à : "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date : mercredi 2 mai 2018 à 00:41 À : openstack-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] problem in pppoe testing

2018-05-01 Thread Ni, Hongjun
Hi xyxue, This is a implementation mechanism: To set up a PPPoE session, you need to first go through PPPoE discovery stage. Via which VPP will learn a PPPoE link entry. Then you can create a PPPoE session successfully. You cannot configure a oE session directly without PPPoE discovery

Re: [vpp-dev] router plugin ISIS

2018-05-01 Thread Burt Silverman
Apparently the question of whether IS-IS is a layer 2 protocol or a layer 3 protocol falls into the realm of religious wars. It's one I had never been near; the issue had never come up for me. But I like Tony Li's statement,

[vpp-dev] DPDK specific good practice/test to check for regression?

2018-05-01 Thread Ray Cai via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi all: I'm trying to bring up VPP to run over failsafe PMD in DPDK mode. Since I'm changing one of the assumptions VPP has regarding to DPDK port indexes, I'm wondering if there are more extensive DPDK related tests/manual validations than 'make test' I can do to be more confident about not

Re: [vpp-dev] segfault due to movaps unaligned access

2018-05-01 Thread Dave Barach
Hey Ray, That's a good idea, and none too hard to implement. It's on my list. I'm a bit afraid of what I may find when I turn it on, but anyhow... Thanks... D. -Original Message- From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Ray Kinsella Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 10:58

Re: [vpp-dev] segfault due to movaps unaligned access

2018-05-01 Thread Ray Kinsella
Is it worth to use an assert (or similar) to validate the assumption in the debug build at least. Well at least until the compiler bugs get's sorted? Ray K On 26/04/2018 17:08, Dave Barach wrote: Yes, it’s arguably a compiler bug. But, it makes no sense to vec_validate_aligned(…),

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance Trending - the Dashboard is out

2018-05-01 Thread Ray Kinsella
W00t! Great work - another big step in trace-ability. Ray K On 29/04/2018 22:08, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) wrote: Hi, Per updates on VPP and CSIT project calls, few of us in CSIT worked on getting the VPP performance trending into a usable shape. We got there in the end, initial

Re: [vpp-dev] Config file for QoS

2018-05-01 Thread Ray Kinsella
Hi Reza, Have you tried starting with the CLI? set dpdk interface hqos subport ... etc Ray K On 30/04/2018 08:33, Reza Mirzaei wrote: Hi I want to set qos parameters according to this tutorial , but i couldn't find the file for port, subport and

Re: [vpp-dev] Dynamically attach to a PCI device

2018-05-01 Thread Ray Kinsella
Hi Avi, Good question - really depends on how you want to do it. To my knowledge it is not supported with DPDK. You can achieve similar functionality using af_packet - but clearly it won't be anything like as fast. Ray K On 01/05/2018 08:11, Avi Cohen (A) wrote: With Ovs-Dpdk this is

[vpp-dev] Set different QoS parameters for different pipes (different customers)

2018-05-01 Thread Reza Mirzaei
Hi I want to set up quality of service in vpp according to these commands [1], but i don't understand how can i distinguish between different customers from an interface?? because it said here [2] that currently there is not an API to create a new HQoS pipe PROFILE and just ONE is created by

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp vpls configuration

2018-05-01 Thread omid via Lists.Fd.Io
Which node do I trace? then i show trace . On Tuesday, May 1, 2018, 11:49:15 AM GMT+4:30, Neale Ranns wrote: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Command-line_Interface_(CLI)_Guide#packet_tracer   /neale   From: Omid Zeinalpour Date:

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp vpls configuration

2018-05-01 Thread Neale Ranns
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Command-line_Interface_(CLI)_Guide#packet_tracer /neale From: Omid Zeinalpour Date: Tuesday, 1 May 2018 at 08:49 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp vpls

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp vpls configuration

2018-05-01 Thread omid via Lists.Fd.Io
Thanks for reply. I change my configuration vpls based on topolgy.VPLS configuration:MPLS L2VPN VPLS VPP1-VM1  set int state eth1 upset int state eth0 upset int ip address eth1 2.1.1.1/24  mpls tabel add 0 set interface mpls  eth1   enablempls tunnel