Hi All,
In our recent test, I found a performance drop in master branch. I
execute the l2bd test case in a 2.5GHZ CPU and found almost 35% drop compared
to 18.07 release. My test is set two NIC ports to a same bridge domain and send
traffic to test the l2 forward performance. I found
Hi all,
I am trying to build the router-plugin:
make V=0 PLATFORM=vpp TAG=vpp_debug install-deb netlink-install router-install
I am using the Vagrantfile present in vpp repo and am pulling the
current master (as of September 26 2018). I am also pulling the
current master of vppsb.
But I am
You are welcome and thank you for the usage/testing ! :)
And thank you for the bug report too - I made a fix for the stateful
ICMP handling in the master, and added a few testcases to catch it in
the future:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15004/
--a
On 9/26/18, Rubina Bianchi wrote:
> Thanks for
--
Damjan
> On 26 Sep 2018, at 15:59, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:16:04 +0200
> Damjan Marion mailto:dmar...@me.com>> wrote:
>
>>> On 25 Sep 2018, at 15:03, Stephen Hemminger
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I noticed that the PCI domain in VPP is limited to 16 bits.
>>> This
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:16:04 +0200
Damjan Marion wrote:
> > On 25 Sep 2018, at 15:03, Stephen Hemminger
> > wrote:
> >
> > I noticed that the PCI domain in VPP is limited to 16 bits.
> > This is a problem on Azure/Hyper-V and other virtual environments.
> > In these environments, the host
Zhiyong,
> When I use vxlan in both VM and physical machine , packet
> drop issue is come across, after setting VPP MTU = 1600, this issue will
> disappear. As we all know, some of routes on the network doesn’t support
> more than 1518 bytes packet.
> Should I try to use IP
Hi Ole, VPP maintainers,
When I use vxlan in both VM and physical machine , packet drop
issue is come across, after setting VPP MTU = 1600, this issue will disappear.
As we all know, some of routes on the network doesn't support more than 1518
bytes packet.
Should I try to
Peter Mikus
Engineer - Software
Cisco Systems Limited
From: Nicolau, Radu
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 8:38 PM
To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: Kinsella, Ray
Subject: RE: CSIT IPsec AES-GCM 128 tests failing
Hi Peter,
I'm traveling this week so I won't
I test latest master, throughput slowdown is fixed, Although I see growing
memory usage.
I will post a new thread and describe how to reproduce the situation.
Regards
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 3:14 PM emma sdi wrote:
> Excellent, I'm going out of office. I will rerun my test with latest
>
Thank you Damjan for your confirmation.
I'll restore to previous code.
Thanks again.
From: Damjan Marion (damarion)
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 5:52 PM
To: Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China)
Cc: d...@barachs.net; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: unformat_check_input crashed during
Ah, i forgot that you are executing this from constructor before clib_mem_init
happens.
So it is expected not to work. You will need to stay on your old code, sorry
for wasting your time.. :(
--
Damjan
On 26 Sep 2018, at 11:28, Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China)
Hi Damjan,
I tried to rewrite the function reading CPU info from /proc/cpuinfo, using VPP
style functions, for multi-arch dynamic function selection.
But function unformat_check_input failed and crashed.
I pasted the /proc/cpuinfo reading function and gdb process as below.
Could you suggest on
Hi Ken,
I believe it is IPEV2 only at the moment.
Please see
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/get-started-with-ipsec-acceleration-in-the-fdio-vpp-project
Ray K
On 26/09/2018 03:33, yang@itibia.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup ipsec tunnel in VPP and my gateway, but
Thanks for your following up.
From: Andrew Yourtchenko
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 12:31 AM
To: Rubina Bianchi
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Odd problem in adding new session on vpp when its
session table is full
Dear Rubina,
On
14 matches
Mail list logo
