Hi,
make run didn't seem to work,
Logs :
[root@localhost vpp]# ls
build-data build-root docs doxygen dpdk extras gmod LICENSE MAINTAINERS
Makefile README.md RELEASE.md src test virtualenv
[root@localhost vpp]#
[root@localhost vpp]# make run
WARNING: STARTUP_CONF n
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11062): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11062
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/27812346/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 4:03 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:24:36 -0700
> Florin Coras wrote:
>
>> No reader-writer locks are 100's of times slower. In fact reader
>> write locks are slower than normal spin lock.
>>
>
> I guess you meant that i
Welcome ZTE to join!
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 9:22 AM
To: Edward Warnicke
Cc: t...@lists.fd.io; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Wang, Drenfong
; ??? ;
chen...@huachentel.com; lizhuo...@cmhi.chinamobil
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:24:36 -0700
Florin Coras wrote:
> No reader-writer locks are 100's of times slower. In fact reader
> write locks are slower than normal spin lock.
>
> >>>
> >>> I guess you meant that in general, and I can see how for scenarios with
> >> multiple write
> On 31 Oct 2018, at 19:42, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have two buffer chains whose starting vlib_buffer_t's are --
> vlib_buffer_t* chainHead1; (let's call this chain1)
> vlib_buffer_t* chainHead2; (let's call this chain2)
> The chain1, chain2 may have one or more buffers each.
Hi,
I have two buffer chains whose starting vlib_buffer_t's are --
vlib_buffer_t* chainHead1; (let's call this chain1)
vlib_buffer_t* chainHead2; (let's call this chain2)
The chain1, chain2 may have one or more buffers each.
Is there any convenience function which connects the last buffer of
fir
Per emails on this list tap v1 is being deprecated.
tap v1 create/modify/delete and tap v2 is different in that it only has
create/delete.
Some questions:
Is the intent to create a tap v2 modify API and/or to add capabilities to set
interface API?
tap APIs presently have no MTU setting. Is ther
It would seem to make it difficult to find a half-implemented feature. “Has
anyone tried this before?”
Case in-point: L3SPAN (#9336), which seems abandoned, but is of interest.
Jim
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 3:01 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
> wrote:
>
>
> Folks,
>
> Gerrit have this nic
> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-change-cleanup.html
Pros are worth it.
Contributors can still Restore (and rebase) manually if needed,
when they receive an e-mail about the auto-abandon hitting their Change.
> Should we enable that?
+1.
Vratko.
From: vpp-dev@lists.
Hi,
Just wanted to make everyone aware that today’s call is taking
place at 15:00-16:00 UTC, as UK and Europe moved away from Daylight
Saving Time (BST, CEST respectively), and looking thru the window
Summer time is definitely over, so time to change our regular habits :)
Updated details are in
OK , it is better, I will try, thanks!
saint_...@aliyun.com
From: Neale Ranns (nranns)
Date: 2018-10-31 17:01
To: saint_...@aliyun.com
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev]ping local address
Hi Saint,
With this change an attacker could send a packet with both the source and
destination both se
Hi Saint,
With this change an attacker could send a packet with both the source and
destination both set to one of VPP’s own addresses. If you include in this new
sub-condition to only accept locally generated packets, then we should be good
(b->flags & VNET_BUFFER_F_LOCALLY_ORIGINATED).
Regar
I am going to check with Vanessa...
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 21:32 +, Michal Cmarada via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
jvpp-ioampot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11049): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11049
Mute This Topic: https://li
> On Oct 30, 2018, at 9:02 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> No, we don’t support RCU. Wouldn’t rw-locks be enough to support your
>> usecases?
>
> Florin
>
>> On Oct 29, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Stephen Hemminger
>> wrote:
>>
15 matches
Mail list logo