[vpp-dev] Doubts about NAT #nat44 #nat

2019-12-16 Thread baixiaopeng
I'm testing the NAT feature, and after configuring the NAT, the trace information is as follows below, Why is the nat44-in2out-worker-handoff node followed by the nat44-out2in node instead of the nat44-in2out node? P.S: trace information Packet 1 02:23:07:173961: af-packet-input af_packet: hw_i

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP VSZ shoots to 200GB because of DPDK plugin

2019-12-16 Thread siddarth rai
Hi Damjan, The issue here is that huge core files are generated, which take up a lot of space and the system down time is huge too. Even if I compress it, I will have to de-compress wherever I try to debug it and the disk space requirement will be huge. It will be interesting to get a hint on what

Re: [vpp-dev] May see some job restarts/retries for the next couple of hours

2019-12-16 Thread Ed Kern via Lists.Fd.Io
Ok piggybacked on jenkins restart (they had to deinstall totally unrelated plugin) and got the cloud collapse done. I rechecked a couple of jobs but things seem to be running smoothly at this point. Feel free to reach out in email or slack if folks see issues. thanks, Ed > On Dec 16, 2019

[vpp-dev] May see some job restarts/retries for the next couple of hours

2019-12-16 Thread Ed Kern via Lists.Fd.Io
TLDR: some infra and arm job (especially) may see some restarts or rechecks needed for the next couple of hours Ill hopefully be collapsing the arm and and csit clusters into the primary cluster so some random behavior may be seen. This is especially true when nodes are removed from one cluste

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP / tcp_echo performance

2019-12-16 Thread dchons
Hi Florin, >From my logs it seems that TSO is not on even when using the native driver, >logs attached below. I'm going to do a deeper dive into the various networking >layers involved in this setup, will post any interesting findings back on this >thread. Thank you for all the help so far! R

[vpp-dev] Coverity run FAILED as of 2019-12-16 14:00:57 UTC

2019-12-16 Thread Noreply Jenkins
Coverity run failed today. Current number of outstanding issues are 2 Newly detected: 0 Eliminated: 0 More details can be found at https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fd-io-vpp/view_defects -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14900): ht

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP VSZ shoots to 200GB because of DPDK plugin

2019-12-16 Thread Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
What is exact problem here? vsz is just virual memory size, it doesn’t mean that memory is allocated... Can you share your startup.conf? — Damjan > On 16 Dec 2019, at 13:59, siddarth rai wrote: > > Hi Benoit, > > Unfortunately, that is not an option for me. I am using dpdk plugin. > > Re

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP VSZ shoots to 200GB because of DPDK plugin

2019-12-16 Thread siddarth rai
Hi Benoit, Unfortunately, that is not an option for me. I am using dpdk plugin. Regards, Siddarth On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:50 PM Benoit Ganne (bganne) wrote: > No idea why DPDK is so greedy, however what do you use the DPDK for? In a > lot of scenario we can run VPP without DPDK. In this case

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP VSZ shoots to 200GB because of DPDK plugin

2019-12-16 Thread Benoit Ganne (bganne) via Lists.Fd.Io
No idea why DPDK is so greedy, however what do you use the DPDK for? In a lot of scenario we can run VPP without DPDK. In this case, you could disable the dpdk plugin. Best ben > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of chetan bhasin > Sent: lundi 16 décembre 2019 0