Re: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?

2020-12-15 Thread Elias Rudberg
Hi Klement, > > I see no reason why this shouldn’t be configurable. > > [...] > > Would you like to submit a patch? Here is a patch making it configurable: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30433 Best regards, Elias -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

Re: [vpp-dev] Core Load Calculation

2020-12-15 Thread bjeremy32
What we did was to count clock cycles (timestamps) spent processing the nodes, call this busy, and count the clock cycles spent elsewhere, call this idle. And then simply output (busy/(busy + idle). We did this per thread and stored the calculations globally. We then outputted the calculations

[vpp-dev] Check running status of vpp

2020-12-15 Thread ashish . saxena
Hi All, I am using VPP version 20.05.1 on my setup and my application is running vppctl commands after checking that VPP process is created , but sometimes it happens that though vpp process is created and vpp is running, still vpp doesn't accept any vppctl commands and is giving this error:

Re: [vpp-dev] Core Load Calculation

2020-12-15 Thread Nick Zavaritsky
We’ve been using flamegraphs quite successfully to see how much leeway is there. Ex: https://gist.githack.com/mejedi/d5d094df63faba66d413a677fcef26e3/raw/95294d36c4b180ba6741d793bf345041b00af48e/g.svg On 15 Dec 2020, at 19:53, Ramkumar B via lists.fd.io wrote: Hello All, I'm trying to

Re: [vpp-dev] Core Load Calculation

2020-12-15 Thread Dave Barach
In rough terms, you can model vector size as a function of offered load [and graph trajectory / configured features] with three linear segments. * Dead asleep – single-digit vector sizes * Keeping up – vector sizes up to the no-drop offered load * Hitting the wall – vector

[vpp-dev] Core Load Calculation

2020-12-15 Thread Ramkumar B
Hello All, I'm trying to calculate VPP core's load. I completely understand about the polling cores' 100% CPU usage. My requirement is different where I need to calculate the core's load based on how much more PPS it can handle before a packet drop occurs in the queue. The vec/call is a good

Re: [vpp-dev] MAINTAINER for extras/rpm?

2020-12-15 Thread Dave Wallace
Hi Jim, Thank you for letting us know and volunteering to maintain the rpm builds. I'm certainly willing to help, but have limited experience with rpms. Also, please let us know if/when you transition to another OS and any other CI needs. Thanks, -daw- On 12/14/2020 8:33 PM, Jim Thompson

[vpp-dev] VPP 21.01 RC1 tomorrow 16 dec 2020 @ 12:00 UTC

2020-12-15 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
Hi all, Just a friendly reminder that tomorrow, 16 December, we cut the stable/2101 branch and build the RC1 artifacts. You may notice the time within the day for the milestones is earlier this time. I changed it, because during the multiple previous occasions I ended up staying up way

[vpp-dev] ip4 ping not working..

2020-12-15 Thread Shiv
Hi Team, I am trying to get VPP working on an interface in an gcp vm. I am unable to ping to another VM and see that the ip4-glean errors are there.. DBGvpp# show hardware-interfaces NameIdx Link Hardware GigabitEthernet0/5/0 1 up