Re: [vpp-dev] A newbie question: "VPP worker threads" vs "vcl worker threads" #vppcom #hoststack

2021-02-24 Thread Florin Coras
Hi Hyong, VCL runs as part of the app process so yes, your intuition was right, vcl and vpp workers are different. Note however that the session layer also accepts attachments from vpp “builtin” applications. Those end up consuming vpp worker cpu cycles as all the signaling will happen on the

[vpp-dev] A newbie question: "VPP worker threads" vs "vcl worker threads" #vppcom #hoststack

2021-02-24 Thread hyongsop
Hi, Are the VPP worker threads, configured in the 'cpu {' section of 'startup.conf', the same as the "workers" or "worker threads" referred to in the context of host stack / vppcom applications?  The answer seems to be no, looking at the implementation of 'vppcom_worker_register()' but wanted

Re: [vpp-dev] IPSec ESP Tunnel mode config

2021-02-24 Thread Govindarajan Mohandoss
Hi Neale, I was wrong. I did a packet capture in null-encryption mode and the packet format is of ESP Transport mode type. Can you please help me to config ESP Tunnel mode ? Do you have any logs/document to refer ? NULL encryption config: vpp# create ipip

Re: [vpp-dev] Increasing NAT worker handoff frame queue size NAT_FQ_NELTS to avoid congestion drops?

2021-02-24 Thread Marcos - Mgiga
Hi Elias, I have been following this discussion and finally I gave VPP a try implementing it as a CGN gateway. Unfortunattely some issues came up, like packets loss and I believe your patch can be helpful, Would mind give me guidance to deploy it? I'm using VPP 20.05 as you did Best Regards

Re: [vpp-dev] IPSec ESP Tunnel mode config

2021-02-24 Thread Neale Ranns
Dear Govind, The tunnel parameters are parsed separately in recent versions. Try: ipsec sa add 20 spi 1000 esp crypto-alg aes-gcm-128 crypto-key 4a506a794f574265564551694d653768 salt 0x12345678 tunnel src 192.83.1.1 dst 192.83.1.2 /neale From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Govindarajan

[vpp-dev] IPSec ESP Tunnel mode config

2021-02-24 Thread Govindarajan Mohandoss
Dear Maintainers, I need help to fix ESP Tunnel mode configuration using debug CLI. Following command is throwing parse error. Can you please share the latest CLI command ? vpp# ipsec sa add 20 spi 1000 esp tunnel-src 192.83.1.1 tunnel-dst 192.83.1.2 crypto-alg aes-gcm-128 crypto-key

Re: [vpp-dev] [Feature Request] NetFlow v9 and NSEL (NEL)

2021-02-24 Thread Denis Lotarev via lists.fd.io
Will be great if anyone write this plugin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#18794): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18794 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/80870620/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe:

Re: [vpp-dev] [Feature Request] NetFlow v9 and NSEL (NEL)

2021-02-24 Thread Ole Troan
Denis, > Yep, im understand that IPFIX already implemented. But IPFIX doesnt support > by LI in our country. Only NetFlow v9 with NSEL/NEL is supported The solution space would include but not limited to: 1) fix country 2) contribute a patch with NSRL/v9 3) write a v9/ IPFIX proxy Cheers,