Hi,
We have a severe problem with VPP – it’s cyclic restarting due to the following
error:
Dec 21 09:46:32 843V0N3 vpp[3846]: vlib_worker_thread_barrier_sync_int: worker
thread deadlock
This happens on both servers of the setup and it cannot recover. Can you please
help us to debug this
Hi all,
We want to run IPSec over vpp and used the IPsec plugin. It did work fine as
long as we don’t use routing tables in VPP. Are routing tables with IPSec
generally not supported in VPP or is there an error in our configuration?
Any help is appreciated!
VPP Version: vpp
Hi all,
We have another problem/question related to VRRP. When the router connect to
the setup has disabled MAC learning, the ARP table on the router doesn't have
the virtual MAC for the VIP but the physical MAC of the interface on the VRRP
master.
Tracing showed that GARP is sent from VIP
c1f=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.fd.io%2Fr%2Fc%2Fvpp%2F%2B%2F34815>.
Can you try applying that patch to your build?
Let me know if that helps.
Thanks,
-Matt
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:06 PM Mechthild Buescher via
lists.fd.io<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454
Hi all,
We are using VPP on two nodes and run VRRP on them. This works fine as long as
we use one VLAN. But if we configure VRs in different VLANs we see strange
behavior: Every 4 seconds, the backup VRRP VR shortly changes to master and
sends an advertisement message to the master and then
uRPF:4 to:[0:0]]
[0] [@0]: dpo-drop ip4
I don’t know how to trace on outgoing packet.
Any help is appreciated
Thanks, BR/Mechthild
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Mechthild Buescher
via lists.fd.io
Sent: Wednesday, 7 July 2021 12:02
To: Matthew Smith
Cc: Neale Ranns ; vpp-dev
4 AM Neale Ranns
mailto:ne...@graphiant.com>> wrote:
Hi Mechthild,
Core VRRP issues I can’t help with, I no next to nothing about VRRP. I’ll hand
over to those who do.
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of Mech
Hi Neale,
I tried different configs in several tables – sorry for confusion
Your suggestion to use ‘via host-Vpp2Host.4093’ doesn’t work properly. Only if
I ping via table 4093 before I do the ping via table 1, it is working as
expected. Else, if I ping via table 1 on a freshly configured
com>> wrote:
Hi Mechthild,
Core VRRP issues I can’t help with, I no next to nothing about VRRP. I’ll hand
over to those who do.
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of Mechthild
Buescher via
lists.fd.io<
;
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of Mechthild
Buescher via lists.fd.io
mailto:mechthild.buescher=ericsson@lists.fd.io>>
Date: Thursday, 24 June 2021 at 10:49
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Hi all,
I still don’t have success. This is the configuration I tried:
set interface state NCIC-1-v1 up
create host-interface name Vpp2Host
set interface state host-Vpp2Host up
ip table add 4093
create sub-interfaces host-Vpp2Host 4093
set interface state host-Vpp2Host.4093 up
set interface ip
put of 'show int addr' and 'sh ip fib 198.19.255.253'?
Best
ben
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Mechthild
> Buescher via lists.fd.io
> Sent: mercredi 30 juin 2021 18:06
> To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: [vpp-dev] next-hop-table between two
s.fd.io On Behalf Of Mechthild
> Buescher via lists.fd.io
> Sent: mercredi 30 juin 2021 18:06
> To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: [vpp-dev] next-hop-table between two FIB tables results in
> punt and 'unknown ip protocol'
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> we are using VPP with
Hi all,
we are using VPP with several FIB tables and when we use 'next-hop-table' the
ip4-lookup results somehow in 'unknown ip protocol'. Can you please help?
Our setup:
* 1 (out of 2) with VPP and a DPDK interface
The VPP version is (both nodes):
vpp# show version verbose
Version:
ct2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=43a4cf37-1c3ff635-43a48fac-869a14f4b08c-2b79380bed927e16=1=c3c90cbe-5ad1-4c2c-b574-111bb859ccb5=https%3A%2F%2Fgerrit.fd.io%2Fr%2Fc%2Fvpp%2F%2B%2F32298>
/neale
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of Mecht
Hi all,
we are using VPP on two nodes where we would like to run VRRP. This works fine
if the VRRP VR interface is in fib 0 but if we but the interface into FIB table
1 instead, VRRP is not working correctly anymore. Can you please help?
Our setup:
* 2 nodes with VPP on each node and one
16 matches
Mail list logo