Re: [vpp-dev] vpp with dpdk shared library

From: Damjan Marion <dmarion.li...@gmail.com> Sent: 27. maj 2018 11:42 To: Michael Lilja <m...@napatech.com> Cc: Catalin Fierut <catalin.fie...@gmail.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp with dpdk shared library Dear Michael, interesting work. Do you plan to u

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp with dpdk shared library

Hi, I had to use another DPDK source base also as shared library, so I went though a few trails before I got things to work. I have documented my quirks here: https://www.napatech.com/vpp-200g-nic/ I hope it is helpful. /Michael From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of

Re: [vpp-dev] Calling a C function in one plugin from another plugin?

Perfect, that seems like a much easier solution :) Thanks /Michael From: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" <dbar...@cisco.com> Sent: Monday, 5 February 2018, 4.17 PM To: Michael Lilja; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Subject: RE: Calling a C function in one plugin from an

[vpp-dev] Calling a C function in one plugin from another plugin?

Hi, I'm looking at using DPDK rte_flow (generic flow API) for ACL offloading. From what I can see the only option I have is to implement a v1_msg_* receiver in the DPDK plugin to accept commands from ACL via the SHMEM rings. The concern I have is that this might be in conflict with the design