On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
>
>
> I’ve updated nat_show_config_reply https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/14411/,
> hope it is all here now
>
>
>
> Matus
>
Awesome! I have +1'ed it!
Thank you!
jdl
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Endless NAT Questions
I think nat_show_config_reply should be augmented with some fields reflecting
newer features.
You are correct deterministic and endpoint-dependent are mutually exclusive.
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd
: [vpp-dev] Endless NAT Questions
Matus,
Should the nat_show_config_reply structure be augmented
to have the (newer) fields added to it?
I'm thinking specifically about:
- the nat64_* values
- the dpo selection,
- the dslite values,
- the endpoint-dependent indication.
Als
Matus,
Should the nat_show_config_reply structure be augmented
to have the (newer) fields added to it?
I'm thinking specifically about:
- the nat64_* values
- the dpo selection,
- the dslite values,
- the endpoint-dependent indication.
Also, it looks like "deterministic" and "end
