> On Jul 12, 2019, at 9:53 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
>
>>> 5. you should consider using vlib_buffer_enqueue_to_next() instead of
>>> vlib_get_next_frame/vlib_put_next_frame scheme
>>
>> Can you help me understand this? I may be reading the code wrong but
>> vlib_buffer_enqueue_to_next()
> On 12 Jul 2019, at 15:40, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review.. I have a comments and a question inline...
>
>> On Jul 12, 2019, at 9:11 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>
>> Hi Cristian,
>>
>> You are not fist one trying to do that, few of us did and we all failed :).
Thanks for the review.. I have a comments and a question inline...
> On Jul 12, 2019, at 9:11 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
>
>> ...
>
> Hi Cristian,
>
> You are not fist one trying to do that, few of us did and we all failed :).
:)
> Few comments:
>
> 1. It is going to be painful to use "perf
>
> On 12 Jul 2019, at 06:14, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> [re-sending w/o extra email addresses]
>
> Hi vpp-dev,
>
> So I'm writing a plugin to support IPTFS
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs-01), and during this
> process I've written a macro to support prefetching
[re-sending w/o extra email addresses]
Hi vpp-dev,
So I'm writing a plugin to support IPTFS
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs-01), and during this
process I've written a macro to support prefetching the second half of N (where
N is power of 2) buffers and acting on the
