On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:57 AM, wrote:
> Jon,
>
> >
> > I am no fairly confident that this patch fixes the race condition issue
> > that I was seeing.
> >
> > Now. I am now failry confident
>
Wow. I suck at this typing ting! :-)
> > And I am still seeing the build failure. Is there any
Jon,
>
> I am no fairly confident that this patch fixes the race condition issue
> that I was seeing.
>
> Now. I am now failry confident
>
> And I am still seeing the build failure. Is there any chance
> of getting this patch or a similar fix in place?
Yes, that should now be taken care
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
>
> Ole,
>
> I am no fairly confident that this patch fixes the race condition issue
> that I was seeing.
>
Now. I am now failry confident
And I am still seeing the build failure. Is there any chance
of getting this patch or a similar
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:16 AM, wrote:
> Jon,
>
> I have also seen this error. What I suspect happens is that while pneum is
> already built and that the build dependency is correct, the library isn't
> installed under the install- directory yet.
>
> I didn't manage to reproduce it right now, but
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:16 AM, wrote:
> Jon,
>
>
> > On 8 Mar 2017, at 01:34, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >
> > S, despite the Peanut Gallery, I'm not yet crazy... :-)
> >
> > Now all we have to do is find the missing dependency in a Ma
Jon,
> On 8 Mar 2017, at 01:34, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> Hi Billy,
>
> S, despite the Peanut Gallery, I'm not yet crazy... :-)
>
> Now all we have to do is find the missing dependency in a Makefile! :-)
>
> Thanks,
> jdl
>
> I may
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
> Hi Billy,
>
> S, despite the Peanut Gallery, I'm not yet crazy... :-)
>
> Now all we have to do is find the missing dependency in a Makefile! :-)
>
> Thanks,
> jdl
>
I may not be crazy (yet), but I am in a vacuum.
OK, as a review, here
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Billy McFall wrote:
> I have seen this. I was compiling in a VM with 5 CPUs. I isolate CPUs 1-4
> from Linux via kernel cmdline arg isocpu. When compiling with 1 CPU I saw
> the issue every time. Removed isocpu and compiled with 5 CPUs everything
> worked.
>
> Bill
I have seen this. I was compiling in a VM with 5 CPUs. I isolate CPUs 1-4
from Linux via kernel cmdline arg isocpu. When compiling with 1 CPU I saw
the issue every time. Removed isocpu and compiled with 5 CPUs everything
worked.
Billy McFall
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
Guys,
I am in the process of setting up a CI engine here. (Whee!)
This is on an entirely new machine with a new number of CPUs, etc.
What I'm noticing is that every other build or so fails. And it seems
to be for lack of a -lpneum each time it fails. But sometimes it all
builds properly too.
W
10 matches
Mail list logo