dhat.com>>;
csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>; vpp-dev
<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07
Hello,
RECOMMENDATION
After reviewing the results, CSIT team recommends to apply the
dhat.com>>;
csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>; vpp-dev
<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07
Hello,
RECOMMENDATION
After reviewing the results, CSIT team recommends to apply the
: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 10:28 AM
To: Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>; csit-...@lists.fd.io; vpp-dev
<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07
Hello,
RECOMMENDATION
After reviewing the results, CSIT team recommends to apply the l2fib M
Hello,
RECOMMENDATION
After reviewing the results, CSIT team recommends to apply the l2fib MAC
scale fix to vpp17.07 ASAP, as the fix greatly improves the NDR and PDR
performance for all tested L2BD MAC scale scenarios. However, CSIT team
wants to note that the VPP performance after the fix still
.@lists.fd.io] *On
> Behalf Of *Billy McFall
> *Sent:* Monday, August 28, 2017 12:47 PM
> *To:* Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco.com>
> *Cc:* csit-...@lists.fd.io; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 1
On 28 Aug 2017, at 17:47, Billy McFall
> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
> wrote:
+ csit-dev
Billy,
Per the last week CSIT project call, from CSIT
+ csit-dev
Billy,
Per the last week CSIT project call, from CSIT perspective, we
classified your reported issue as Test coverage escape.
Summary
===
CSIT test coverage got fixed, see more detail below. The CSIT tests
uncovered regression for L2BD with MAC learning with higher total number
loj) <l...@cisco.com>
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:05 AM, John Lo (loj)
<l...@cisco.com<mailto:l...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Billy,
The output of “show l2fib” is showing how many MAC entri
d than before.
Billy
> Above are a few generic comments I can think of, without knowing much
> details about how the tests are setup and measured. Hope it can help to
> explain the different behavior observed between 1704 and 1707.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Joh
s,
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] *On
> Behalf Of *Billy McFall
> *Sent:* Monday, August 14, 2017 6:40 PM
> *To:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> *Subject:* [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07
>
>
>
> In
Monday, August 14, 2017 6:40 PM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07
In the last VPP call, I reported some internal Red Hat performance testing was
showing a significant drop in performance between releases 17.04 to 17.07. This
with l2-bridge testing
In the last VPP call, I reported some internal Red Hat performance testing
was showing a significant drop in performance between releases 17.04 to
17.07. This with l2-bridge testing - PVP - 0.002% Drop Rate:
VPP-17.04: 256 Flow 7.8 MP/s 10k Flow 7.3 MP/s 1m Flow 5.2 MP/s
VPP-17.07: 256 Flow
12 matches
Mail list logo