Re: [vpp-dev] VPP crashed on servers with unusual numa config

2019-02-28 Thread Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
Can you please try: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/17950/ I don't have such "special" configuration :) Thanks, Damjan > On 28 Feb 2019, at 06:31, Lijian Zhang wrote: > > Hi Maintainers, > I have two supermicro x86 servers with unusual numa configs. The first

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP crashed on servers with unusual numa config

2019-02-28 Thread Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io
victory. FWIW... Dave From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 6:02 AM To: Lijian Zhang Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP crashed on servers with unusual numa config Current code assumes that all numa nodes have memory

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP crashed on servers with unusual numa config

2019-02-28 Thread Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
Current code assumes that all numa nodes have memory present, which is reasonable assumption for any production use. It is on my todo list to improve handling of such cases, but it is not 5-minute task, so I cannot promise anything soon. Simply changing from "online" to "has_memory" will not

[vpp-dev] VPP crashed on servers with unusual numa config

2019-02-27 Thread Lijian Zhang
Hi Maintainers, I have two supermicro x86 servers with unusual numa configs. The first server has two physical CPUs, but only one numa node. The other server has two physical CPUs, two numa nodes, but only numa node 0 has attached memories. The detailed CPU info are dumped as below. VPP