Re: [vpp-dev] _mm_testz_si128 Woes

The trick I like, when I don't need quite so much detail as the guide provides, is to simply remember to look in 2 places for header files, /usr/include AND /usr/lib/gcc. From /usr/lib/gcc, it is easy to find one's way down to the include directory for intrinsics. The trick seems to cover both Ubun

Re: [vpp-dev] _mm_testz_si128 Woes

The Intel intrinsics guide are a handy reference for this kind of thing. https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=_mm_testz_si128 You need to trim the additional underscore off the intrinsic to look it up. Ray K On 20/02/2018 02:52, Florin Coras wrote: Okay, I take t

Re: [vpp-dev] _mm_testz_si128 Woes

Hopefully this will help: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/10670 compiles fine in my centos7 container. On 20 Feb 2018, at 03:52, Florin Coras mailto:fcoras.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: Okay, I take that back. Google tells me these are SSE4 intrinsics, not SSE2 … Florin On Feb 19, 2018, at 5:50 PM, E

Re: [vpp-dev] _mm_testz_si128 Woes

Okay, I take that back. Google tells me these are SSE4 intrinsics, not SSE2 … Florin > On Feb 19, 2018, at 5:50 PM, Ed Kern wrote: > > yes…it was considered a trivial rebase…. > > IF that was the case then ill take the wrap for that one wrt it getting a +1… > > in a nutshell.. patch 2 faile

Re: [vpp-dev] _mm_testz_si128 Woes

yes…it was considered a trivial rebase…. IF that was the case then ill take the wrap for that one wrt it getting a +1… in a nutshell.. patch 2 failed…got its -1 ok fine. someone came and did a trivial rebase…IF those last three jobs docs, csit-virl and whatever were also not set to run on tri

Re: [vpp-dev] _mm_testz_si128 Woes

That’s .. interesting. Patch set 3 didn’t run all the jobs. Any idea why that would happen? Instead of reverting the patch, here’s a hammer-based attempt at solving the problem [1]. Damjan, feel free to propose a prettier solution :) Florin [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/10660/

Re: [vpp-dev] _mm_testz_si128 Woes

On Feb 19, 2018, at 2:47 PM, Jon Loeliger mailto:j...@netgate.com>> wrote: Hey hey hey, I tried to build a variant of vppsb and failed miserably for lack of the __mm_testz_si128 symbol. Wont make you feel better but my centos builds have been rolling and croaking over this for a few hours a

[vpp-dev] _mm_testz_si128 Woes

Hey hey hey, I tried to build a variant of vppsb and failed miserably for lack of the __mm_testz_si128 symbol. >From whence does that arrive on my doorstep? I'm trying to figure out if vppsb needs to #define something new, or #include something first, or if my system is suddenly missing somethin