amar...@cisco.com>>; vpp-dev
<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>
*Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
Hongjun,
This looks suspect:
*03:32:31*APIGEN vlibmemory/memclnt.api.h *03:32:31* JSON API
vlibmemory/memclnt.api.json *03:32:31* SyntaxError: invalid synt
s.org>
Cc: Dave Barach (dbarach) <dbar...@cisco.com>; Gabriel Ganne
<gabriel.ga...@enea.com>; Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>; Damjan Marion
(damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
Hi Marco,
Than
ach (dbarach) <dbar...@cisco.com>; Gabriel Ganne
<gabriel.ga...@enea.com>; Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>; Damjan Marion
(damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 06:58 +,
lese
<mvarl...@suse.de>; Gabriel Ganne <gabriel.ga...@enea.com>; Billy McFall
<bmcf...@redhat.com>; Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev
<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
Hi Hongjun,
I have no OpenSUSE at hand, and co
.@cisco.com>; Marco Varlese
> <mvarl...@suse.de>; Gabriel Ganne <gabriel.ga...@enea.com>; Billy McFall
> <bmcf...@redhat.com>; Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev
> <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fai
gt;; Gabriel Ganne <gabriel.ga...@enea.com>; Billy McFall
<bmcf...@redhat.com>; Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev
<vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
Hongjun,
This looks suspect:
03:32:31 APIGEN vlibmemory/m
.@enea.com>;
> Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev
> <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
>
> Dear Marco,
>
> Thanks very much...
>
> Dave
>
> From
(dbarach)
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 11:19 PM
To: Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de>; Gabriel Ganne <gabriel.ga...@enea.com>;
Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>
Cc: Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] op
lt;damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
We (at SUSE) are currently pushing an update to 2.2.11 for openSUSE in our
repositories.
Once that's confirmed to be upstream, I will push a new patch to the
ci-management repo to ha
to:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io]
> On Behalf Of Gabriel Ganne
>
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 8:42 AM
>
> To: Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>; Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de>
>
> Cc: Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-.
<bmcf...@redhat.com>; Marco Varlese <mvarl...@suse.de>
Cc: Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>; vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
Hi,
If you browse the source http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/indent/
The tag 2.2.11 is
-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> on behalf of
Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 2:26:42 PM
To: Marco Varlese
Cc: Damjan Marion (damarion); vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] openSUSE build fails
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Marco Varlese
<mvarl...@suse.de<
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Marco Varlese wrote:
> Hi Damjan,
>
> On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 09:06 +, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15 Dec 2017, at 08:52, Marco Varlese wrote:
>
> Damjan,
>
> On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 16:04 +, Damjan Marion
t;gnu")
* End:
*/
Thanks… Dave
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
Behalf Of Marco Varlese
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 5:16 AM
To: Damjan Marion (damarion) <damar...@cisco.com>
Cc: vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] op
Folks,
On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 11:15 +0100, Marco Varlese wrote:
[NIP]
> Ok, so just summarizing our conversation on IRC for others too.
>
> That issue is connected to the different versions of INDENT (C checkstyle)
> installed on the different distros.
>
> openSUSE runs 2.2.10 whilst CentOS and
On 15 Dec 2017, at 08:52, Marco Varlese
> wrote:
Damjan,
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 16:04 +, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote:
Folks,
I'm hearing from multiple people that OpenSUSE verify job is failing (again).
I haven't heard (or read) anything over
On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 08:52 +0100, Marco Varlese wrote:
> Damjan,
>
> On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 16:04 +, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'm hearing from multiple people that OpenSUSE verify job is failing
> > (again).
Would it be possible to have a list (few) of build logs
Dear David,
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:01 -1000, David Cornejo wrote:
> I'm a newcomer to this list, so treat my opinion with suspicion...
> I think that there's a governance policy involved. I don't think that the
> committers should feel obligated to support something that is not in their
>
Damjan,
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 16:04 +, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm hearing from multiple people that OpenSUSE verify job is failing (again).
I haven't heard (or read) anything over the mailing list otherwise I would have
looked into it.
Also, if you hear anything like
Agreed, doing functional testing against one distro should suffice (famous last
words :-)).
What do people think about running the verify jobs for the debians and then
periodically (once per day/week?) run for the other distros, to make sure
they’re not broken?
Florin
> On Dec 14, 2017, at
I'm a newcomer to this list, so treat my opinion with suspicion...
I think that there's a governance policy involved. I don't think that the
committers should feel obligated to support something that is not in their
interest. OpenSUSE verification needs a champion, and if that champion does
not
Folks,
I'm hearing from multiple people that OpenSUSE verify job is failing (again).
So generally speaking i would like to question having verify jobs for multiple
distros.
Is there really a value in compiling same code on different distros. Yes I know
gcc version can be different,
but that
22 matches
Mail list logo