Re: [vpp-dev] vlib_add_trace(...) - stop inlining?

2020-06-08 Thread Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io
@lists.fd.io> <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> On Behalf Of Dave Barach via lists.fd.io > <http://lists.fd.io/> > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 10:13 AM > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> > Subject: [vpp-dev] vlib_add_trace(...) - stop inli

Re: [vpp-dev] vlib_add_trace(...) - stop inlining?

2020-06-08 Thread John Lo (loj) via lists.fd.io
ject: [vpp-dev] vlib_add_trace(...) - stop inlining? Folks, It looks to me like inlining vlib_add_trace(...) is probably a mistake in terms of code bloat. Does anyone hate the idea of changing it to a standard function? Thanks... Dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to

Re: [vpp-dev] vlib_add_trace(...) - stop inlining?

2020-06-08 Thread Dave Barach via lists.fd.io
lists.fd.io Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 10:13 AM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [vpp-dev] vlib_add_trace(...) - stop inlining? Folks, It looks to me like inlining vlib_add_trace(...) is probably a mistake in terms of code bloat. Does anyone hate the idea of changing it to a standard function? Thanks

[vpp-dev] vlib_add_trace(...) - stop inlining?

2020-06-08 Thread Dave Barach via lists.fd.io
Folks, It looks to me like inlining vlib_add_trace(...) is probably a mistake in terms of code bloat. Does anyone hate the idea of changing it to a standard function? Thanks... Dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#16686):