Re: [vpp-dev] vmxnet3 devices

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:19 PM Damjan Marion wrote: > > > On 7 Mar 2019, at 18:57, Jim Thompson wrote: > > > > On Mar 7, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io < > dmarion=me@lists.fd.io> wrote: > > > > On 7 Mar 2019, at 18:33, Matthew Smith wrote: > > > Hi all, > > At startup,

Re: [vpp-dev] vmxnet3 devices

> On 7 Mar 2019, at 18:57, Jim Thompson wrote: > > > >> On Mar 7, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io >> mailto:dmarion=me@lists.fd.io>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 7 Mar 2019, at 18:33, Matthew Smith >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> At

Re: [vpp-dev] vmxnet3 devices

> On Mar 7, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io > wrote: > > > >> On 7 Mar 2019, at 18:33, Matthew Smith wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> At startup, the DPDK plugin attempts to take over most PCI network devices >> which are supported by a PMD and are not in use by the

Re: [vpp-dev] vmxnet3 devices

> On 7 Mar 2019, at 18:33, Matthew Smith wrote: > > > Hi all, > > At startup, the DPDK plugin attempts to take over most PCI network devices > which are supported by a PMD and are not in use by the kernel. It seems that > vmxnet3 is an exception to this - if vmxnet3 devices are present,

[vpp-dev] vmxnet3 devices

Hi all, At startup, the DPDK plugin attempts to take over most PCI network devices which are supported by a PMD and are not in use by the kernel. It seems that vmxnet3 is an exception to this - if vmxnet3 devices are present, they are blacklisted unless they were explicitly whitelisted in