erything was done right.
>>>>
>>>> I am totally fine with “Rebase if necessary”.
>>>> But personally I often rebase patches before submitting.
>>>> Especially these that might affect several components.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
&g
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP DPDK build failure with Mellanox interface(aarch64)
Hi Marek,
Thanks for the analysis. VPP's gerrit "Submit Type" is "Rebase if Necessary". This
means that occasionally we may encounter build breakage due to dependent patches. Changing the type to
base patches before submitting.
>>>> Especially these that might affect several components.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Marek
>>>>
>>>> From:
>>>> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>>>> ] On B
] On Behalf Of Dave Wallace
Sent: 6 marca 2018 16:59
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP DPDK build failure with Mellanox interface(aarch64)
Hi Marek,
Thanks for the analysis. VPP's gerrit "Submit Type" is "Rebase if Necessary". This
means that occasionally we may enco
>> Especially these that might affect several components.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marek
>>
>> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Dave
>> Wallace
>> Sent: 6 marca 2018 16:59
>> To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
>> Subject: Re:
components.
Regards,
Marek
*From:*vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] *On Behalf Of
*Dave Wallace
*Sent:* 6 marca 2018 16:59
*To:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
*Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] VPP DPDK build failure with Mellanox
interface(aarch64)
Hi Marek,
Thanks for the analysis. VPP's gerrit
patches before submitting.
Especially these that might affect several components.
Regards,
Marek
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Dave Wallace
Sent: 6 marca 2018 16:59
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP DPDK build failure with Mellanox interface
version of 10920 with updated service definitions:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/10973/
Regards,
Marek
*From:*vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] *On Behalf Of
*Dave Wallace
*Sent:* 6 marca 2018 00:19
*To:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
*Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] VPP DPDK build failure wi
definitions:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/10973/
Regards,
Marek
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Dave Wallace
Sent: 6 marca 2018 00:19
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP DPDK build failure with Mellanox interface(aarch64)
Sirshak,
The JVPP error was caused
On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 16:44 -0600, Sirshak Das wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Thanks for replying.
> I am not sure if you read the last part of my email:
> > > Finally what is strange is if I copy dpdk-18.02.tar.gz to seperate
> > > location and turn MLx5 config and build this builds fine.
Indeed I
Sirshak,
The JVPP error was caused by a patch (10920) that somehow passed the
Verify job, but failed during the merge job. I have just merged the
patch (10965) which reverts the patch which introduced the JVPP build
errors.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 3/5/2018 5:44 PM, Sirshak Das wrote:
Hi Marco,
Hi Marco,
Thanks for replying.
I am not sure if you read the last part of my email:
>> Finally what is strange is if I copy dpdk-18.02.tar.gz to seperate
>> location and turn MLx5 config and build this builds fine.
>>
>> Build drivers/net/mlx5
>> CC mlx5.o
>> PMDINFO mlx5.o.pmd.c
>> CC
Hi Sirshak,
Can you please take a look at this thread:
https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/8219
Also, take a look at http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.html for detailed
explanations and steps for DPDK to work with Mellanox NICs...
Likely, it's a kernel issue: for Mellanox latest PMD
13 matches
Mail list logo
