Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

Good news is that we’re still in time for the change. Bad news is that there’s no time for a real ‘community vote’ on this. I also liked the first option better but since Ole and Jon pushed for the change, I went with what they liked. Does anyone object to using the first option? Thanks,

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

Hrm, I personally feel the breakdown by file to be more useful than who made the change. Chris > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On > Behalf Of Florin Coras > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 1:58 PM > To: Ole Troan

Re: [vpp-dev] a vppctl ping bug in 17.10-rc2?

Yes, please file a bug at jira.fd.io . I’ll look into this soon, suspect it’s an interaction of the non-interactive cli interface. Chris. From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of John Wei Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 18:53 To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io

[vpp-dev] a vppctl ping bug in 17.10-rc2?

in 17.07.01 a vppctl ping works. It ping 5 times, then stop. in 17.10-rc2 same vppctl ping command, got aborted: 64 bytes from 10.10.2.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=.3473 ms Aborted due to a keypress. I not familiar with the code yet. Just to file bug. :) John

[vpp-dev] What can be traced?

*vppctl trace add* af-packet-input 10 was mentioned in this write up: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Progressive_VPP_Tutorial#Action:_Add_trace Is there write-up on - list of things that we can turn on tracing? - what is the number "10" means? John ___

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

Updated release notes to use the format Jon proposed. Florin > On Oct 25, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > > Thanks Jon, love that! > > So something like: > git shortlog --format="* [%h] %s" v17.07..v17.10-rc2 -- *.api > > Cheers, > Ole > > >> On 25 Oct 2017, at

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

Thanks Jon, love that! So something like: git shortlog --format="* [%h] %s" v17.07..v17.10-rc2 -- *.api Cheers, Ole > On 25 Oct 2017, at 07:13, Jon Loeliger wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > Hi Florin, > > Hi Ole, > >

Re: [vpp-dev] IS THERE ANY SETUP FOR BUILDING AND TESTING ALL THE FD.IO MODULES TOGETHER

Hi Sharath, Not at the moment, you need to grab the ones you and build individually. Which modules are you interested in? Ray K On 25/10/2017 13:28, Sharath Kumar wrote: Hello all, I am a newbie to fd.io . I have started with setting up dev environment by following this link

Re: [vpp-dev] vppctl -s option?

If you do a 'file' on vppctl now - you will see its a binary. Strange must have been an installer issue. Ray K On 25/10/2017 02:06, John Wei wrote: Hi Ray, I upgraded my vpp version to 17.10-rc2. And vppctl does accept -s option. Maybe we need to document that -s in only supported started

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > Hi Florin, > Hi Ole, > What about something like this? > > #!/usr/bin/env python > import os, fnmatch, subprocess > starttag = 'v17.07' > endtag = 'v17.10-rc2' > apifiles = [] > for root, dirnames, filenames in

[vpp-dev] On orthogonality of tests within a single test/test_foo.py file

Folks, Klement suggested to bring it up on the list to discuss what is the best option as seen by the community. It concerns the independence of tests within a single test/test_foo.py file. From the behavior of the test system I saw the tests being executed in lexicographic order pertaining

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

Florin, > Looks good to me. I’d add it after the list of APIs that changed. Is that > fine with you? > Sure is! Cheers Ole > Cheers, > Florin > >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 5:28 AM, Ole Troan wrote: >> >> Hi Florin, >> >> What about something like this? >> >>

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

Hi Ole, Looks good to me. I’d add it after the list of APIs that changed. Is that fine with you? Cheers, Florin > On Oct 25, 2017, at 5:28 AM, Ole Troan wrote: > > Hi Florin, > > What about something like this? > > #!/usr/bin/env python > import os, fnmatch,

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.10 draft release notes

Hi Florin, What about something like this? #!/usr/bin/env python import os, fnmatch, subprocess starttag = 'v17.07' endtag = 'v17.10-rc2' apifiles = [] for root, dirnames, filenames in os.walk('.'): for filename in fnmatch.filter(filenames, '*.api'):

[vpp-dev] IS THERE ANY SETUP FOR BUILDING AND TESTING ALL THE FD.IO MODULES TOGETHER

Hello all, I am a newbie to fd.io. I have started with setting up dev environment by following this link https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Setting_Up_Your_Dev_Environment . This setup is building only VPP libs. (so I was considering it as a VPP setup and not a FD.IO setup) IS THERE ANY SETUP FOR

Re: [vpp-dev] SEGSEGV in acl using 2 core configuration

Dear Khers, okay, cool! When testing the debug image, you could save the full dump and the .debs for all the artefacts so just in case I could grab the entire set of info and was able to look at it in my environment. Meantime, I had an idea for another potential failure mode, whereby the session

Re: [vpp-dev] GRE error on vpp 17.04

Hi Ewan, As with all interface types, if you want to RX IP traffic on a GRE interface, then it either needs an IP address or to be unnumbered to another interface that has an address. Regards, neale From: "yug...@telincn.com" Date: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 at 05:34 To: