Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to build vppsb router plugin (librtnl)

2018-06-01 Thread Yusuke Tatsumi
Glaze, Thanks for your helpful information. BTW, I noticed that "tcpdump -i vpp0" cause VPP process crush while using rtnl. I have not researched root cause yet, and I will avoid to use tcpdump in production area as workaround. Thanks, Tatsumi. 差出人: Glaza

Odp: RE: [vpp-dev] Failed to build vppsb router plugin (librtnl)

2018-06-01 Thread Glaza
Yes I do see error without lacp.   Yusuke Tatsumi wrote Hi Glaza,   Thanks for your patch! I also build successfully with your patch on CentOS 7.3 (kernel 3.10).     > But when I tried to use it with lacp I got: > rtnl_ns_recv:398: Received notification while in sync. Restart synchronization. >

[vpp-dev] Use libvcl_ldpreload with gdb #vpp

2018-06-01 Thread ductm18
Hi, I'm trying to develop an app using the vcl library. Unfortunately, I cannot start the app with gdb when preloading the library. I start it with this command: > > sudo VCL_DEBUG=2 LDP_DEBUG=2 > LD_PRELOAD=/home/hardcore/ductm/vpp/lib64/libvcl_ldpreload.so gdb > ./epoll-server Sometimes, gdb cr

[vpp-dev] VPP for academics

2018-06-01 Thread Jerome Tollet
Here is another example where VPP is used as a tool for academic research work: https://newnet.telecom-paristech.fr/index.php/fairdrop/ Jerome

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiarch/target select for dpdk_device_input

2018-06-01 Thread Nitin Saxena
Hi Damjan, > It was hard to know that you have subset of patches hidden somewhere. I wouldn't say patches are hidden. We are trying to fine tune dpdk-input initially from our end first and later we will seek your expertise while upstreaming. > Typically it makes sense to discuss such kind of

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiarch/target select for dpdk_device_input

2018-06-01 Thread Damjan Marion
Hi Nitin, inline... > On 1 Jun 2018, at 15:23, Nitin Saxena wrote: > > Hi Damjan, > > > It was hard to know that you have subset of patches hidden somewhere. > I wouldn't say patches are hidden. We are trying to fine tune dpdk-input > initially from our end first and later we will seek your

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiarch/target select for dpdk_device_input

2018-06-01 Thread Nitin Saxena
Hi Damjan, Answers Inline. Thanks, Nitin On Friday 01 June 2018 08:49 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: Hi Nitin, inline... On 1 Jun 2018, at 15:23, Nitin Saxena wrote: Hi Damjan, It was hard to know that you have subset of patches hidden somewhere. I wouldn't say patches are hidden. We are tr

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiarch/target select for dpdk_device_input

2018-06-01 Thread Damjan Marion
Dear Nitin, I really don't have anything else to add. It your call how do you want to proceed Regards, Damjan > On 1 Jun 2018, at 18:02, Nitin Saxena wrote: > > Hi Damjan, > > Answers Inline. > > Thanks, > Nitin > > On Friday 01 June 2018 08:49 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: >> Hi Nitin, >

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiarch/target select for dpdk_device_input

2018-06-01 Thread Nitin Saxena
Hi Damjan, Now that you are aware that Cavium is working on optimisations for ARM, can I request that you check with us on implications for ARM(at least Cavium), before bringing changes in dpdk-input? Regards, Nitin On 01-Jun-2018, at 21:39, Damjan Marion mailto:dmar...@me.com>> wrote: Dea

[vpp-dev] Regressions detected in vpp master branch

2018-06-01 Thread Jan Gelety
Hello vpp developers, Thanks to csit trending job there are detected following regressions in vpp master branch: 1. M-core SRv6-proxy tests with IMIX packets: https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/trending/trending/srv6.html#id2 2. Small regression in case of 4-core eth-l2xc, dot1q-l2xc

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiarch/target select for dpdk_device_input

2018-06-01 Thread Damjan Marion
Dear Nitin, That doesn't work that way. Regards, Damjan > On 1 Jun 2018, at 19:41, Saxena, Nitin wrote: > > Hi Damjan, > > Now that you are aware that Cavium is working on optimisations for ARM, can > I request that you check with us on implications for ARM(at least Cavium), > before br

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiarch/target select for dpdk_device_input

2018-06-01 Thread Nitin Saxena
Hi Damjan, If VPP is an open-source project that supports multiple architectures, then there should be a review of every commit which provides others using the open source project an opportunity to raise their concerns. So my request is to post changes for review before they are committed to en

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp with dpdk shared library

2018-06-01 Thread Rami Rosen
Michael, Regarding using the same PCI ID for all ports: I just want to note that there are other NICs supported by DPDK, which have this behaviour. See, for example: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-September/002410.html This thread talks about an issue when trying some specific OVS setup. I

Re: [vpp-dev] Rx stuck to 0 after a while

2018-06-01 Thread Rubina Bianchi
Dear Andrew Sorry for delayed response. I checked your second patch and here is my test result: Best case is still the best and vpp throughput is Maximum (18.5 Gbps) in my scenario. Worst case is getting better than past. I never see deadlock again and throughput increases from 50 Mbps to 5.5

Re: [vpp-dev] Rx stuck to 0 after a while

2018-06-01 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
Dear Rubina, Excellent, thank you very much! The change is in the master now. Note that to keep the default memory footprint the same I have temporarily halved the default upper limit on sessions (since we create two bihash entries now instead of one). FYI, I plan to do some more work on sessi