Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:43 PM Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via lists.fd.io
wrote:
> First draft created [0] for the change that will switch
>
> licenses for Python files used together with Scapy.
>
>
>
> For
Hi Paul,
as you refer to this specific story which is close to my heart (as I am the one
who triggered the whole drama by -2'ed), let me clarify:
> The Netgate folks had a changeset they were waiting a month or so for a
> review, then they were told that it was too close to the release to merge
I am a firm -1.
I already have a python script that generates maintainers, but I would
rather we look at the maintainer plugin which was contributed to gerrit by
Cisco. https://gerrit.googlesource.com/plugins/maintainer/
As to Andrew's point, it is just as fair to propose that if a maintainer
Hi Paul,
My original motivation for this proposal is to improve the stability and
availability of the CI system by not abusing it through lack of queue
maintenance.
The situation exists today because there is fundamentally a shortage of
committer bandwidth to complete code reviews. This is
> Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed?
I think e-mail reply would be long,
and I will need to address comments anyway,
so I respond via a Gerrit change [1].
Vratko.
[1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/31025
From: Paul Vinciguerra
Sent: Friday, 2021-January-29 15:29
To: Vratko
Ben,
It was not intended toward you at all. In fact, in my experience, you are
very helpful. I was only looking to highlight cases that did not
specifically benefit me.
Would you like a different change for me to highlight? How about
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27349? That is mine, though.
